LOFF ranks 4th and SPCM 7th of 9 funds in the 2x Long SpaceX Category.
LOFF vs SPCM
0.0%by weight
LOFF −0.52pt a year
0.97%1.49%
LOFF 2.1×the volume
2.14M1.01M
LOFF vs SPCM Performance
+34.0%+35.9%
- LOFF 0.97%, better
- SPCM 1.49%
- LOFF $80M
- SPCM $19M
- LOFF 7
- SPCM 2
- LOFF 2.14M sh, better
- SPCM 1.01M sh
- LOFF $12.82
- SPCM $13.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LOFF | SPCM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67Higher | D28 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D36 | C43Higher |
| Tradability | C53Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B67Higher | D37 |
Rank among 2x Long SpaceX funds
Same Category. LOFF and SPCM are both graded against the same 9 2x Long SpaceX funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LOFFB
SPCMD
In short
LOFF Direxion's 2x daily bull on SpaceX, out June 15, 2026, days after the IPO. The leverage resets every night, which makes it a short-horizon lever on the stock rather than a long-term stake in the rocket company.
SPCM Leveraged SpaceX trading got crowded fast. SPCM is Tradr's long side: swaps-backed exposure aiming for 2x the stock's daily move before fees, reset every session. The recipe is standard for the aisle, so the 1.49% price tag is what sets it apart.
Stated mandate
LOFF The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. common shares.
SPCM The fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily performance of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. common shares before fees and expenses. Its objective applies only over a trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LOFF vs SPCM Holdings
How LOFF and SPCM differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of LOFF and 0.0% of SPCM.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for LOFF and SPCM.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for LOFF and SPCM.
Concentration
- LOFF100.0%
- SPCM106.2%
- LOFF1
- SPCM2
Asset class
- LOFF
- Leveraged/Inverse
- SPCM
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in LOFF1
- In both0
- Only in SPCM2
Only in LOFF
1 security, 16.7% of LOFF by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50616.69%
Only in SPCM
2 securities, 100% of SPCM by weight
- Cashusd88.72%
- Cfd Space Exploration Techn-Cl A17.52%
Weight gaps
LOFF and SPCM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LOFF vs SPCM Cost
Overpaying SPCM vs LOFF
$7,943
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LOFF 0.97%
$18,198
SPCM 1.49%
$26,141
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LOFF | SPCM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $2,574 | $862 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $9,464 | $3,021 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $26,141 | $7,943 |
- 0.97%LOFF, cheaper
- 1.49%SPCM
- Middle half of 2x Long SpaceX funds
- Median 0.97%
LOFF 4th cheapest of 9 funds
SPCM 6th cheapest of 9 funds
LOFF vs SPCM Dividends
- LOFF
- SPCM None
- LOFF $0.02
- SPCM
- LOFF Sep 22, 2026
- SPCM
- LOFF Sep 29, 2026
- SPCM
- LOFF Quarterly
- SPCM
Distribution history
LOFF vs SPCM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- LOFF 0.00SPCM 0.00Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
LOFF and SPCM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
