Skip to content
etf.net

LOHA vs PKB

Roundhill HALO ETF

LOHABCboe

Invesco Building & Construction ETF

PKBCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LOHA −0.22pt a year

LOHA0.35%PKB0.57%

Avg volume · 30D

LOHA 1.02×the volume

LOHA31.1KPKB30.4K

LOHA vs PKB Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.8%LOHA−10.6%PKB

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. LOHA +1.8%. PKB −10.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−5%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LOHA 0.35%, better
PKB 0.57%
Fund size
LOHA $35M
PKB $259M
1Y total return
LOHA No data
PKB −6.2%
Yield (12M)
LOHA No data
PKB 0.20%
Holdings
LOHA 102
PKB 32
Avg volume (30D)
LOHA 31.1K sh, better
PKB 30.4K sh
NAV per share
LOHA $26.46
PKB $89.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LOHA: Cost 60, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 92, Durability 51. PKB: Cost 31, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings 40, Durability 88.
Pillar letters and Scores for LOHA, PKB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLOHAPKB
Cost30% weightB60HigherD31
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherF24
Tradability15% weightC54A79Higher
Holdings10% weightA92HigherC40
Durability5% weightC51A88Higher

Rank among US Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LOHA and PKB are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Thematic⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

LOHA ranks 3rd and PKB 8th of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1ALRNDNYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BLOHARoundhill HALO ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BHOMZHoya Capital Housing ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 7CVRAIVirtus Real Asset Income ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 8CPKBInvesco Building & Construction ETFScore 44
  7. Rank 9CFTIFFirst Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LOHABRoundhill HALO ETF

PKBCInvesco Building & Construction ETF

In short

LOHA No data

PKB Not a homebuilder tracker. PKB has run a rules-based screen since 2005, ranking US builders, engineers and construction firms on momentum, quality and value, then holding roughly 30 of them.

Stated mandate

LOHA No data

PKB The Fund seeks to track the performance of its designated underlying index before fees and expenses. It is an index fund that invests primarily in securities comprising that index and is not actively managed.

Why people hold it

LOHA No data

  • PKB The index scores companies on price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action and value, so the lineup follows a model's ranking rather than sheer market cap.invesco.com
  • Trading since 2005, it has a live record stretching across the housing bust and the rebuild that followed, which is rare on the construction shelf.
  • The net is wider than houses: builders plus the engineering and construction outfits behind commercial buildings and large-scale infrastructure are all eligible.invesco.com
  • Rebalanced and reconstituted on a set quarterly schedule, so the roster refreshes with the model instead of drifting for years.invesco.com

Worth knowing

LOHA No data

  • PKB The 0.57% expense ratio sits well above the 0.20% median of its peer cohort. That is the price tag on a screened, narrow-industry portfolio.
  • About 30 stocks in one cyclical industry: individual names and the building cycle swing this fund far more than a broad US equity fund.
  • It is thinly traded next to the giant sector ETFs, so spreads and trade timing carry more weight than they would on a heavily traded fund.

Full LOHA profile⁠

Full PKB profile⁠

LOHA vs PKB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LOHA vs PKB Cost

Overpaying PKB vs LOHA

$4,145

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LOHA 0.35%

    $7,126

  • PKB 0.57%

    $11,271

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LOHA 0.35%
  • PKB 0.57%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PKB $11,271LOHA $7,126

Year by year

YearLOHAPKBOverpaying
10$634$1,023$389
20$2,454$3,921$1,467
30$7,126$11,271$4,145

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%LOHA, cheaper
  • 0.57%PKB
  • Middle half of US Thematic funds
  • Median 0.35%

LOHA 7th cheapest of 22 funds

PKB 16th cheapest of 22 funds

LOHA vs PKB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LOHA No data
PKB 0.20%
Payout (12M)
LOHA None
PKB $0.18
Last payment
LOHA No data
PKB $0.01
Ex-dividend
LOHA No data
PKB Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
LOHA No data
PKB Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
LOHA No data
PKB Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

LOHAAll LOHA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PKBQuarterly · 36 paymentsAll PKB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 36 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.02; Sep 18, 2017 $0.01; Dec 18, 2017 $0.03; Jun 18, 2018 $0.05; Sep 24, 2018 $0.03; Dec 24, 2018 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.05; Sep 23, 2019 $0.04; Dec 23, 2019 $0.03; Mar 23, 2020 $0.02; Jun 22, 2020 $0.04; Sep 21, 2020 $0.04; Dec 21, 2020 $0.02; Mar 22, 2021 $0.02; Jun 21, 2021 $0.04; Sep 20, 2021 $0.04; Dec 20, 2021 $0.04; Mar 21, 2022 $0.02; Jun 21, 2022 $0.04; Sep 19, 2022 $0.05; Dec 19, 2022 $0.07; Mar 20, 2023 $0.04; Jun 20, 2023 $0.08; Sep 18, 2023 $0.05; Dec 18, 2023 $0.04; Mar 18, 2024 $0.03; Jun 24, 2024 $0.05; Sep 23, 2024 $0.07; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 24, 2025 $0.0064; Jun 23, 2025 $0.06; Sep 22, 2025 $0.02; Dec 22, 2025 $0.04; Mar 23, 2026 $0.03; Jun 22, 2026 $0.11; Sep 21, 2026 $0.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

LOHA vs PKB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LOHA No dataPKB 26.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LOHA No dataPKB 0.76
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LOHA No dataPKB −34.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LOHA −0.29PKB 1.50

Popular comparisons

  • LOHABvsLRNDA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PKBCvsLRNDA

    Invesco Building & Construction ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsTECBA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PKBCvsTECBA

    Invesco Building & Construction ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsHOMZB

    Roundhill HALO ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PKBCvsHOMZB

    Invesco Building & Construction ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.57% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.