Skip to content
etf.net

LOHA vs USMD

Roundhill HALO ETF

LOHABCboe

CoreValues America First Technology ETF

USMDDNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

LOHA −0.52pt a year

LOHA0.35%USMD0.87%

Avg volume · 30D

LOHA 143.1×the volume

LOHA31.1KUSMD217

LOHA vs USMD Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.8%LOHA+0.3%USMD

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. LOHA +1.8%. USMD +0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LOHA 0.35%, better
USMD 0.87%
Fund size
LOHA $35M
USMD $0
Holdings
LOHA 102
USMD 122
Avg volume (30D)
LOHA 31.1K sh, better
USMD 217 sh
NAV per share
LOHA $26.46
USMD $29.94
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LOHA: Cost 60, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 92, Durability 51. USMD: Cost 0, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 56, Durability 28.
Pillar letters and Scores for LOHA, USMD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLOHAUSMD
Cost30% weightB60HigherF0
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherC46
Tradability15% weightC54HigherC41
Holdings10% weightA92HigherB56
Durability5% weightC51HigherD28

Rank among US Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LOHA and USMD are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Thematic⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

LOHA ranks 3rd and USMD 22nd of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1ALRNDNYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BLOHARoundhill HALO ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BHOMZHoya Capital Housing ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 21DFMKTThe Free Markets ETFScore 29
  6. Rank 22DUSMDCoreValues America First Technology ETFScore 26

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LOHABRoundhill HALO ETF

USMDDCoreValues America First Technology ETF

In short

LOHA No data

USMD One of the newest names in US thematic tech: USMD tracks Solactive's America First Technology Index for an all-domestic technology sleeve, with long-term capital appreciation, not income, as the stated goal.

Stated mandate

LOHA No data

USMD The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

LOHA No data

  • USMD Rules first, hunches second: it follows a published Solactive index, so the selection logic is written down before the trades happen.
  • Geography is unambiguous. A US equity mandate keeps the theme home, rather than blending domestic and overseas tech under one label.
  • Plain-vanilla fund plumbing: a 1940 Act ETF, so you get standard 1099 reporting instead of partnership paperwork.

Worth knowing

LOHA No data

  • USMD Fee is the headline trade-off: 0.87% a year, while thematic-tech neighbors like LRND (0.14%) and TECB (0.30%) charge a fraction of that.
  • It opened in 2026, so there is no multi-year record yet, and small, thinly traded funds tend to carry wider bid-ask spreads.
  • Growth mandate, not a paycheck: the prospectus objective is capital appreciation, and income is not part of the design.

Full LOHA profile⁠

Full USMD profile⁠

LOHA vs USMD Holdings

How LOHA and USMD differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of USMD and 0.0% of LOHA.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile92.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for LOHA and USMD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LOHA and USMD, widest gap first
CountryMore in LOHAMore in USMD
United StatesUSMD +7.8 points
CanadaLOHA +5.8 points
BrazilLOHA +1.2 points
SwedenLOHA +1.0 points
Other countries (3)USMD +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LOHA11.5%
  • USMD46.7%

Securities held

  • LOHA101
  • USMD121

Asset class

LOHA
Equity
USMD
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LOHA101
  • In both0
  • Only in USMD121

Only in LOHA

101 securities, 100% of LOHA by weight

  • Valaris Ltd1.22%
  • Carnival Corp Ltd1.22%
  • Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd1.21%

Only in USMD

121 securities, 100% of USMD by weight

  • Tesla Inc6.54%
  • Palantir Technologies Inc6.09%
  • Microsoft Corp5.58%

Weight gaps

LOHA and USMD share no securities.

All LOHA holdings⁠All 122 USMD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LOHA vs USMD Cost

Overpaying USMD vs LOHA

$9,410

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LOHA 0.35%

    $7,126

  • USMD 0.87%

    $16,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LOHA 0.35%
  • USMD 0.87%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530USMD $16,536LOHA $7,126

Year by year

YearLOHAUSMDOverpaying
10$634$1,542$908
20$2,454$5,830$3,376
30$7,126$16,536$9,410

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%LOHA, cheaper
  • 0.87%USMD
  • Middle half of US Thematic funds
  • Median 0.35%

LOHA 7th cheapest of 22 funds

USMD 22nd cheapest of 22 funds

LOHA vs USMD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
LOHA None
USMD None

Distribution history

LOHAAll LOHA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

USMDAll USMD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LOHA vs USMD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LOHA −0.29USMD 1.83

Popular comparisons

  • LOHABvsLRNDA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • USMDDvsLRNDA

    CoreValues America First Technology ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsTECBA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • USMDDvsTECBA

    CoreValues America First Technology ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsHOMZB

    Roundhill HALO ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • USMDDvsHOMZB

    CoreValues America First Technology ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.87% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.