Skip to content

LOHA vs WNDR

Roundhill HALO ETF

LOHABCboe

Corgi Travel & Leisure ETF

WNDRCCboe

Overlap

3.2%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

LOHA0.35%WNDR0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

LOHA 65.4×the volume

LOHA31.1KWNDR475

LOHA vs WNDR Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+2.9%LOHA−1.5%WNDR

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. LOHA +2.9%. WNDR −1.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−5%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LOHA 0.35%
WNDR 0.35%
Fund size
LOHA $36M
WNDR $1M
Holdings
LOHA 102
WNDR 58
Avg volume (30D)
LOHA 31.1K sh, better
WNDR 475 sh
NAV per share
LOHA $26.77
WNDR $26.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LOHA: Cost 60, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 92, Durability 51. WNDR: Cost 60, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 16, Holdings 43, Durability 18.
Pillar letters and Scores for LOHA, WNDR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLOHAWNDR
Cost30% weightB60B60
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherC54
Tradability15% weightC54HigherF16
Holdings10% weightA92HigherC43
Durability5% weightC51HigherF18

Rank among US Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LOHA and WNDR are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Thematic⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

LOHA ranks 3rd and WNDR 11th of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1ALRNDNYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BLOHARoundhill HALO ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BHOMZHoya Capital Housing ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 11CNYNYCorgi NYC Based ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 11CWNDRCorgi Travel & Leisure ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 11CYUNGCorgi Longevity Consumer ETFScore 40

LOHA vs WNDR Holdings

How LOHA and WNDR differ

Overlap by weight

3.2%

Shared holdings make up 7.9% of WNDR and 3.2% of LOHA.

Level by level

  • Holdings3 in both3.2%
  • Countryby domicile87.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for LOHA.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LOHA and WNDR, widest gap first
CountryMore in LOHAMore in WNDR
CanadaLOHA +5.8 points
United StatesLOHA +4.7 points
ChinaWNDR +3.7 points
MexicoWNDR +3.0 points
United KingdomWNDR +2.6 points
IrelandWNDR +2.5 points
BrazilLOHA +1.2 points
SwedenLOHA +1.0 points
IndiaWNDR +0.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LOHA11.5%
  • WNDR45.8%

Securities held

  • LOHA101
  • WNDR57

Asset class

LOHA
Equity
WNDR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LOHA98
  • In both3
  • Only in WNDR54

Only in LOHA

98 securities, 96.8% of LOHA by weight

  • Valaris Ltd1.22%
  • Lamb Weston Holdings Inc1.17%
  • ConocoPhillips1.14%

Only in WNDR

54 securities, 92.1% of WNDR by weight

  • Walt Disney Co/The6.62%
  • American Express Co5.76%
  • First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20315.49%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in LOHA and WNDR, widest gap first
HoldingMore in LOHAMore in WNDR
Royal Caribbean Cruises LtdRCLWNDR +3.25 points
Carnival Corp LtdCCLWNDR +1.46 points
SkyWest IncSKYWWNDR +0.02 points

All LOHA holdings⁠All 30 WNDR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LOHA vs WNDR Cost

Same expense ratio

$7,126

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LOHA 0.35%

    $7,126

  • WNDR 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LOHA 0.35%
  • WNDR 0.35%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530LOHA $7,126WNDR $7,126

Year by year

YearLOHAWNDR
10$634$634
20$2,454$2,454
30$7,126$7,126

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%LOHA
  • 0.35%WNDR
  • Middle half of US Thematic funds
  • Median 0.35%

LOHA 7th cheapest of 22 funds

WNDR 7th cheapest of 22 funds

LOHA vs WNDR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
LOHA None
WNDR None

Distribution history

LOHAAll LOHA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

WNDRAll WNDR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LOHA vs WNDR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LOHA −0.29WNDR −2.20

Popular comparisons

  • LOHABvsLRNDA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WNDRCvsLRNDA

    Corgi Travel & Leisure ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOHABvsTECBA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WNDRCvsTECBA

    Corgi Travel & Leisure ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOHABvsHOMZB

    Roundhill HALO ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WNDRCvsHOMZB

    Corgi Travel & Leisure ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.