Skip to content

LOWV vs SIXL

AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

LOWVBNYSE Arca

ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity ETF

SIXLBNYSE Arca

Overlap

7.8%by weight

Expense ratio

LOWV −0.07pt a year

LOWV0.39%SIXL0.46%

Avg volume · 30D

LOWV 1.7×the volume

LOWV7.72KSIXL4.56K

3Y return · a year

LOWV +5.6pt

LOWV+17.4%SIXL+11.8%

LOWV vs SIXL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.9%LOWV+15.3%SIXL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LOWV +8.9%. SIXL +15.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LOWV 0.39%, better
SIXL 0.46%
Fund size
LOWV $209M
SIXL $207M
1Y total return
LOWV +8.9%
SIXL +15.3%, better
Yield (12M)
LOWV 0.84%
SIXL 2.07%, better
Holdings
LOWV 73
SIXL 242
Avg volume (30D)
LOWV 7.72K sh, better
SIXL 4.56K sh
NAV per share
LOWV $84.51
SIXL $40.16
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LOWV: Cost 66, Risk 45, Mission 80, Tradability 71, Holdings 55, Durability 62. SIXL: Cost 57, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings 81, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for LOWV, SIXL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLOWVSIXL
Cost30% weightB66HigherB57
Mission25% weightA80Not scored
Risk15% weightC45C54Higher
Tradability15% weightA71HigherD34
Holdings10% weightB55A81Higher
Durability5% weightB62B69Higher

Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LOWV and SIXL are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Low Volatility⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

LOWV ranks 4th and SIXL 5th of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.

  1. Rank 1ASELVSEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACGCVCapital Group Conservative Equity ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3ATOAKTwin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BLOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 5BSIXLETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 6CHUSVFirst Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LOWVBAB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

SIXLBETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity ETF

In short

LOWV A stock picker's answer to low volatility. AB runs about 70 US large caps through its own quality, profitability and value screen instead of tracking a published low-vol index, at 0.39% a year.

SIXL Most low-volatility funds fish in the S&P 500 and stop. SIXL screens the whole US market for low-beta, profitable, quality names, lands on roughly 240 of them, and pays monthly.

Stated mandate

LOWV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio primarily invested in U.S. large-cap equities, with an emphasis on lower volatility than the broader equity market.

SIXL The Fund seeks capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • LOWV Actively managed, not rules-mirrored: AB selects names on quality, profitability and value, aiming for lower volatility than the broad US market rather than copying a low-vol index.alliancebernstein.com
  • 0.39% sits below the going rate for active low-vol equity ETFs, so less of the defensive premium goes to the manager.
  • The portfolio does what the label says: US large caps, roughly 70 names, S&P 500 as the yardstick. Among the closer mandate-to-holdings matches in its defensive peer group.
  • Concentration with intent. About 70 stocks means each pick carries weight, and income arrives on a quarterly schedule.
  • SIXL Starts from a total-market US equity index, then screens on low beta plus quality, profitability and growth. Defensive posture, but it reaches past the mega caps.
  • Roughly 240 stocks, one of the better-diversified portfolios in its peer group, so no single name runs the show.
  • Distributions arrive monthly rather than on the quarterly schedule most stock funds keep.
  • At 0.46% with no waiver propping up the number, the fee sits near the category median instead of above it.

Worth knowing

  • LOWV Thinly traded for the category. Limit orders and a glance at the spread matter more here than in a mega-fund.
  • Launched in 2023, so the record is short. Low-vol strategies earn their keep across full drawdowns, and this one hasn't seen many.
  • Competitive on fee, not the floor: peers SELV (0.15%) and CGCV (0.33%) charge less for a similar defensive brief.
  • SIXL Shares trade thinly, so the bid/ask spread on a round trip can cost more than a year of the fee.
  • Cheaper neighbors exist: SELV charges 0.15% and LOWV 0.39% against 0.46% here, though the portfolios behind them differ.
  • Low beta aims to soften the ride, not remove it. This is a fully invested stock portfolio and it can fall with the market.

Full LOWV profile⁠

Full SIXL profile⁠

LOWV vs SIXL Holdings

How LOWV and SIXL differ

Overlap by weight

7.8%

Shared holdings make up 19.2% of LOWV and 7.9% of SIXL.

Level by level

  • Holdings18 in both7.8%
  • Sector11 Sectors55.6%
  • Countryby domicile89.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in LOWV and SIXL, widest gap first
SectorMore in LOWVMore in SIXL
TechnologyLOWV +28.8 points
UtilitiesSIXL +11.2 points
Consumer StaplesSIXL +10.6 points
EnergySIXL +10.1 points
Real EstateSIXL +9.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryLOWV +6.1 points
CommunicationLOWV +4.6 points
Health CareLOWV +2.5 points
IndustrialsLOWV +2.3 points
FinancialsSIXL +2.0 points
MaterialsSIXL +1.6 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LOWV and SIXL, widest gap first
CountryMore in LOWVMore in SIXL
United StatesSIXL +9.8 points
United KingdomLOWV +5.4 points
TaiwanLOWV +2.0 points
CanadaLOWV +1.3 points
NetherlandsLOWV +1.2 points
IrelandLOWV +0.8 points
Other countries (2)SIXL +0.9 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LOWV39.2%
  • SIXL5.2%

Securities held

  • LOWV71
  • SIXL241

Asset class

LOWV
Equity
SIXL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LOWV53
  • In both18
  • Only in SIXL223

Only in LOWV

53 securities, 79.8% of LOWV by weight

  • Apple Inc Common Stock USD.000016.67%
  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006255.99%
  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.0015.93%

Only in SIXL

223 securities, 91.6% of SIXL by weight

  • Pacira Biosciences Inc0.56%
  • Qualys Inc0.56%
  • Option Care Health Inc0.54%

Weight gaps

All 18 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in LOWV and SIXL, widest gap first
HoldingMore in LOWVMore in SIXL
Mckesson Corp Common Stock USD.01MCKLOWV +1.63 points
AbbVie Inc Common Stock USD.01ABBVLOWV +1.48 points
Philip Morris International Common StockPMLOWV +1.17 points
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common StockXOMLOWV +1.15 points
American Electric Power Common Stock USD6.5AEPLOWV +1.05 points
Colgate Palmolive Co Common Stock USD1.0CLLOWV +0.97 points
Automatic Data Processing Common Stock USD.1ADPLOWV +0.77 points
Cboe Global Markets Inc Common StockCBOELOWV +0.74 points

All 69 LOWV holdings⁠All 241 SIXL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LOWV vs SIXL Cost

Overpaying SIXL vs LOWV

$1,332

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LOWV 0.39%

    $7,898

  • SIXL 0.46%

    $9,230

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LOWV 0.39%
  • SIXL 0.46%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530SIXL $9,230LOWV $7,898

Year by year

YearLOWVSIXLOverpaying
10$705$830$125
20$2,725$3,195$470
30$7,898$9,230$1,332

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LOWV, cheaper
  • 0.46%SIXL
  • Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
  • Median 0.47%

LOWV 4th cheapest of 10 funds

SIXL 5th cheapest of 10 funds

LOWV vs SIXL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LOWV 0.84%
SIXL 2.07%, better
Payout (12M)
LOWV $0.71
SIXL $0.84
Last payment
LOWV $0.18
SIXL $0.04
Ex-dividend
LOWV Sep 18, 2026
SIXL Oct 28, 2026
Paid on
LOWV Sep 21, 2026
SIXL Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
LOWV Quarterly
SIXL Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LOWVQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll LOWV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 6, 2023 $0.11; Sep 5, 2023 $0.16; Dec 5, 2023 $0.19; Mar 5, 2024 $0.09; Jun 4, 2024 $0.14; Sep 3, 2024 $0.17; Dec 17, 2024 $0.25; Mar 5, 2025 $0.08; Jun 20, 2025 $0.21; Sep 19, 2025 $0.18; Dec 19, 2025 $0.19; Mar 20, 2026 $0.15; Jun 22, 2026 $0.19; Sep 18, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
SIXLMonthly · 46 paymentsAll SIXL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.01; Feb 23, 2023 $0.05; Mar 27, 2023 $0.09; Apr 25, 2023 $0.02; May 25, 2023 $0.07; Jun 27, 2023 $0.0097; Jul 27, 2023 $0.02; Aug 28, 2023 $0.06; Sep 26, 2023 $0.04; Oct 26, 2023 $0.02; Nov 27, 2023 $0.04; Dec 26, 2023 $0.07; Jan 24, 2024 $0.0081; Feb 26, 2024 $0.04; Mar 25, 2024 $0.06; Apr 24, 2024 $0.02; May 23, 2024 $0.04; Jun 24, 2024 $0.05; Jul 24, 2024 $0.03; Aug 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 24, 2024 $0.05; Oct 24, 2024 $0.02; Nov 25, 2024 $0.05; Dec 30, 2024 $0.07; Jan 30, 2025 $0.04; Feb 27, 2025 $0.04; Mar 27, 2025 $0.08; Apr 29, 2025 $0.07; May 29, 2025 $0.07; Jun 26, 2025 $0.07; Jul 30, 2025 $0.05; Aug 28, 2025 $0.08; Sep 29, 2025 $0.07; Oct 30, 2025 $0.05; Nov 25, 2025 $0.07; Dec 30, 2025 $0.13; Jan 28, 2026 $0.07; Feb 25, 2026 $0.05; Mar 27, 2026 $0.09; Apr 28, 2026 $0.05; May 27, 2026 $0.06; Jun 26, 2026 $0.09; Jul 29, 2026 $0.06; Aug 27, 2026 $0.06; Sep 28, 2026 $0.06; Oct 28, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

LOWV vs SIXL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LOWV 9.9%, betterSIXL 12.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LOWV 1.24, betterSIXL 0.62
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LOWV −13.9%since Mar 2023SIXL −16.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LOWV 0.73SIXL 0.40

Popular comparisons

  • LOWVBvsSELVA

    AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXLBvsSELVA

    ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOWVBvsCGCVA

    AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF · Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXLBvsCGCVA

    ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity ETF · Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOWVBvsTOAKA

    AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF · Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXLBvsTOAKA

    ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity ETF · Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.