SPBO ranks 2nd and LQD 6th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
LQD vs SPBO
SPBO −0.11pt a year
0.14%0.03%
LQD 52.5×the volume
31M591K
SPBO +0.3pt
+2.1%+2.4%
LQD vs SPBO Performance
−4.4%+0.3%
- LQD 0.14%
- SPBO 0.03%, better
- LQD $32B
- SPBO $2.14B
- LQD −1.8%
- SPBO −0.4%, better
- LQD 4.84%
- SPBO 5.28%, better
- LQD 3192
- SPBO 4468
- LQD 31M sh, better
- SPBO 591K sh
- LQD $104.16
- SPBO $27.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LQD | SPBO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D33 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A82 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | A90Higher | A82 |
| Durability | A94Higher | A90 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. LQD and SPBO are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LQDA
SPBOA
In short
LQD One of the first bond ETFs ever launched (2002) and still the ticker traders reach for on corporate credit. Its index takes only big, widely held investment-grade bonds, so you own the liquid end of the market.
SPBO The whole investment-grade corporate bond market in one ticker for three basis points. Most rivals sell you a maturity slice; SPBO owns the lot, and it undercuts other funds tracking the very same Bloomberg index.
Stated mandate
LQD The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds.
SPBO The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LQD vs SPBO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LQD vs SPBO Cost
Overpaying LQD vs SPBO
$2,294
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LQD 0.14%
$2,932
SPBO 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LQD | SPBO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $256 | $55 | $201 |
| 20 | $1,000 | $216 | $784 |
| 30 | $2,932 | $638 | $2,294 |
- 0.14%LQD
- 0.03%SPBO, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
SPBO cheapest of 49 funds
LQD 8th cheapest of 49 funds
LQD vs SPBO Dividends
- LQD 4.84%
- SPBO 5.28%, better
- LQD $5.05
- SPBO $1.48
- LQD $0.44
- SPBO $0.12
- LQD Oct 1, 2026
- SPBO Oct 1, 2026
- LQD Oct 6, 2026
- SPBO Oct 6, 2026
- LQD Monthly
- SPBO Monthly
Distribution history
LQD vs SPBO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LQD
- SPBO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LQD 7.7%SPBO 6.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LQD 0.26SPBO 0.34, better
- Worst fall
- LQD −24.5%SPBO −21.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LQD 1.34SPBO 1.11
LQD and SPBO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.14% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





