USIG ranks 1st and LQD 6th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
LQD vs USIG
USIG −0.10pt a year
0.14%0.04%
LQD 14.4×the volume
31M2.16M
USIG +0.2pt
+2.1%+2.3%
LQD vs USIG Performance
−4.4%+0.8%
- LQD 0.14%
- USIG 0.04%, better
- LQD $32B
- USIG $18B
- LQD −1.8%
- USIG −0.4%, better
- LQD 4.84%
- USIG 4.92%, better
- LQD 3192
- USIG 11595
- LQD 31M sh, better
- USIG 2.16M sh
- LQD $104.16
- USIG $49.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LQD | USIG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D33 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | A82 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | A90 | A97Higher |
| Durability | A94Higher | A92 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. LQD and USIG are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LQDA
USIGA
In short
LQD One of the first bond ETFs ever launched (2002) and still the ticker traders reach for on corporate credit. Its index takes only big, widely held investment-grade bonds, so you own the liquid end of the market.
USIG Most investment-grade corporate bond funds hand you one slice of the maturity curve. USIG takes the whole thing, thousands of US dollar corporate bonds from short-dated to long, for four basis points a year.
Stated mandate
LQD The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds.
USIG The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LQD vs USIG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LQD vs USIG Cost
Overpaying LQD vs USIG
$2,083
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LQD 0.14%
$2,932
USIG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LQD | USIG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $256 | $73 | $183 |
| 20 | $1,000 | $288 | $712 |
| 30 | $2,932 | $849 | $2,083 |
- 0.14%LQD
- 0.04%USIG, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
USIG 3rd cheapest of 49 funds
LQD 8th cheapest of 49 funds
LQD vs USIG Dividends
- LQD 4.84%
- USIG 4.92%, better
- LQD $5.05
- USIG $2.44
- LQD $0.44
- USIG $0.21
- LQD Oct 1, 2026
- USIG Oct 1, 2026
- LQD Oct 6, 2026
- USIG Oct 6, 2026
- LQD Monthly
- USIG Monthly
Distribution history
LQD vs USIG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LQD
- USIG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LQD 7.7%USIG 6.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LQD 0.26USIG 0.34, better
- Worst fall
- LQD −24.5%USIG −21.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LQD 1.34USIG 1.04
LQD and USIG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.14% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





