LQDW ranks 1st and MAGY 18th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
LQDW vs MAGY
LQDW −0.65pt a year
0.34%0.99%
LQDW 2.9×the volume
107K37K
LQDW vs MAGY Performance
+2.0%−4.6%
- LQDW 0.34%, better
- MAGY 0.99%
- LQDW $353M
- MAGY $91M
- LQDW +2.0%, better
- MAGY −4.6%
- LQDW 12.38%
- MAGY 34.24%, better
- LQDW 3192
- MAGY 2
- LQDW 107K sh, better
- MAGY 37K sh
- LQDW $22.87
- MAGY $40.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LQDW | MAGY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D29 |
| Mission | A94Higher | B56 |
| Risk | B66Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | A100Higher | D31 |
| Durability | A82Higher | B58 |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. LQDW and MAGY are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LQDWA
MAGYD
In short
LQDW Covered calls, but on bonds. LQDW owns iShares' flagship investment-grade corporate bond fund and writes monthly calls against it, paying distributions monthly, at less than half the option-income cohort's median fee.
MAGY The Magnificent Seven with a weekly options sleeve: MAGY owns Roundhill's equal-weight seven-stock fund and sells calls against it for income, at 0.99% net of a waiver through April 30, 2028.
Stated mandate
LQDW The fund seeks to track a strategy holding LQD while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.
MAGY The Fund's primary objective is current income, with a secondary objective of gaining exposure to the return of the Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LQDW vs MAGY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LQDW vs MAGY Cost
Overpaying MAGY vs LQDW
$11,593
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LQDW 0.34%
$6,932
MAGY 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LQDW | MAGY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $1,746 | $1,130 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $6,565 | $4,179 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $18,525 | $11,593 |
- 0.34%LQDW, cheaper
- 0.99%MAGY
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
LQDW cheapest of 25 funds
MAGY 18th cheapest of 25 funds
LQDW vs MAGY Dividends
- LQDW 12.38%
- MAGY 34.24%, better
- LQDW $2.83
- MAGY $13.97
- LQDW $0.38
- MAGY $0.20
- LQDW Oct 2, 2026
- MAGY Oct 30, 2026
- LQDW Oct 7, 2026
- MAGY Pays Nov 2, 2026
- LQDW Monthly
- MAGY Weekly
Distribution history
LQDW vs MAGY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LQDW 4.2%MAGY 16.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- LQDW 0.16MAGY 0.65
- Worst fall
- LQDW −9.2%MAGY −14.2%
- Market sensitivity
- LQDW 0.59MAGY 0.96
LQDW and MAGY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

