LQDW ranks 1st and SEMY 23rd of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
LQDW vs SEMY
LQDW −0.80pt a year
0.34%1.14%
SEMY 1.2×the volume
107K127K
LQDW vs SEMY Performance
+1.2%+25.6%
- LQDW 0.34%, better
- SEMY 1.14%
- LQDW $353M
- SEMY $36M
- LQDW +2.0%
- SEMY
- LQDW 12.38%
- SEMY
- LQDW 3192
- SEMY 5
- LQDW 107K sh
- SEMY 127K sh, better
- LQDW $22.87
- SEMY $11.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LQDW | SEMY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | D38 |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. LQDW and SEMY are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LQDWA
SEMYD
In short
LQDW Covered calls, but on bonds. LQDW owns iShares' flagship investment-grade corporate bond fund and writes monthly calls against it, paying distributions monthly, at less than half the option-income cohort's median fee.
SEMY Most income ETFs sell calls on calm blue chips. SEMY sells puts on a 3x leveraged semiconductor fund, converting one of the market's most violent corners into option premium. An income engine bolted onto a volatility furnace.
Stated mandate
LQDW The fund seeks to track a strategy holding LQD while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.
SEMY The Fund seeks to generate income through options strategies, primarily by selling put options on leveraged ETFs tracking the 3x Long ICESEMI Daily ETF. Its secondary objective is exposure to that leveraged ETF, subject to a cap on potential gains.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LQDW vs SEMY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LQDW vs SEMY Cost
Overpaying SEMY vs LQDW
$13,988
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LQDW 0.34%
$6,932
SEMY 1.14%
$20,920
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LQDW | SEMY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $1,998 | $1,382 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $7,462 | $5,076 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $20,920 | $13,988 |
- 0.34%LQDW, cheaper
- 1.14%SEMY
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
LQDW cheapest of 25 funds
SEMY 23rd cheapest of 25 funds
LQDW vs SEMY Dividends
- LQDW 12.38%
- SEMY
- LQDW $2.83
- SEMY
- LQDW $0.38
- SEMY $0.14
- LQDW Oct 2, 2026
- SEMY Oct 30, 2026
- LQDW Oct 7, 2026
- SEMY Pays Nov 3, 2026
- LQDW Monthly
- SEMY Weekly
Distribution history
LQDW vs SEMY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LQDW 4.2%SEMY
- Return per unit of risk
- LQDW 0.16SEMY
- Worst fall
- LQDW −9.2%SEMY
- Market sensitivity
- LQDW 0.59SEMY 0.89
LQDW and SEMY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.14% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.14% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.14% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
