Skip to content

LQDW vs SEMY

iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF

LQDWACboe

GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductor ETF

SEMYDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

LQDW −0.80pt a year

LQDW0.34%SEMY1.14%

Avg volume · 30D

SEMY 1.2×the volume

LQDW107KSEMY127K

LQDW vs SEMY Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.2%LQDW+25.6%SEMY

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LQDW +1.2%. SEMY +25.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%40%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LQDW 0.34%, better
SEMY 1.14%
Fund size
LQDW $353M
SEMY $36M
1Y total return
LQDW +2.0%
SEMY No data
Yield (12M)
LQDW 12.38%
SEMY No data
Holdings
LQDW 3192
SEMY 5
Avg volume (30D)
LQDW 107K sh
SEMY 127K sh, better
NAV per share
LQDW $22.87
SEMY $11.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LQDW: Cost 100, Risk 66, Mission 94, Tradability 78, Holdings 100, Durability 82. SEMY: Cost 6, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for LQDW, SEMY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLQDWSEMY
Cost30% weightA100HigherF6
Mission25% weightA94Not scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherC47
Tradability15% weightA78HigherC50
Holdings10% weightA100Not scored
Durability5% weightA82HigherD38

Rank among Index Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LQDW and SEMY are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Index Option Income⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

LQDW ranks 1st and SEMY 23rd of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ALQDWiShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AEFAAInvesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 22DGIAXNicholas Global Equity and Income ETFScore 31
  4. Rank 23DSEMYGraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductor ETFScore 28
  5. Rank 24FDRMYXFUNDS MEMORY INCOME ETFScore 17

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LQDWAiShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF

SEMYDGraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductor ETF

In short

LQDW Covered calls, but on bonds. LQDW owns iShares' flagship investment-grade corporate bond fund and writes monthly calls against it, paying distributions monthly, at less than half the option-income cohort's median fee.

SEMY Most income ETFs sell calls on calm blue chips. SEMY sells puts on a 3x leveraged semiconductor fund, converting one of the market's most violent corners into option premium. An income engine bolted onto a volatility furnace.

Stated mandate

LQDW The fund seeks to track a strategy holding LQD while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.

SEMY The Fund seeks to generate income through options strategies, primarily by selling put options on leveraged ETFs tracking the 3x Long ICESEMI Daily ETF. Its secondary objective is exposure to that leveraged ETF, subject to a cap on potential gains.

Why people hold it

  • LQDW At 0.34%, it undercuts the typical option-income fund by well over half (cohort median 0.75%), so less of the premium collected leaks out as fees.
  • One ticker buys the whole trade: shares of LQD plus a rules-based monthly call overlay. No options approval, no roll dates to babysit.ishares.com
  • A thin niche. Most option-income funds write calls on stock baskets; this one sits on investment-grade corporate credit instead.
  • Distributions land monthly, and since its 2022 launch the fund has stuck closely to its stated strategy, among the tighter implementations in its peer group.
  • SEMY The mechanism is the point: writing puts on a 3x semiconductor ETF harvests premium priced off triple-leveraged swings, not the milder volatility of ordinary chip shares.graniteshares.com
  • No chip stocks on the books. Exposure runs through options on a leveraged fund, so the income comes from premium collected rather than dividends passed through.graniteshares.com
  • Built as a standard 1940 Act fund: shares trade intraday like any ETF and tax reporting arrives on a 1099, not a K-1.graniteshares.com

Worth knowing

  • LQDW Written calls cap the upside. If corporate bonds rally hard, the premium collected is the consolation for price gains handed to the call buyer.
  • Premium cushions, it does not shield. Widening credit spreads or rising rates still hit the underlying bond portfolio.
  • Mid-sized and moderately traded rather than a giant, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest option-income names, especially in fast markets.
  • SEMY The 1.07% expense ratio runs above what most options-income peers charge. That is the sticker price on actively managed put-writing rather than a passive overlay.
  • Upside is capped by design. A short put collects premium and leaves the big rally to someone else, while the pain side still references a 3x semiconductor fund.
  • Launched in late 2025, so there is little history to judge it by, and the fund discloses that distributions can include return of capital (your own money handed back).

Full LQDW profile⁠

Full SEMY profile⁠

LQDW vs SEMY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LQDW vs SEMY Cost

Overpaying SEMY vs LQDW

$13,988

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LQDW 0.34%

    $6,932

  • SEMY 1.14%

    $20,920

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LQDW 0.34%
  • SEMY 1.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530SEMY $20,920LQDW $6,932

Year by year

YearLQDWSEMYOverpaying
10$616$1,998$1,382
20$2,386$7,462$5,076
30$6,932$20,920$13,988

Expense ratio

  • 0.34%LQDW, cheaper
  • 1.14%SEMY
  • Middle half of Index Option Income funds
  • Median 0.81%

LQDW cheapest of 25 funds

SEMY 23rd cheapest of 25 funds

LQDW vs SEMY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LQDW 12.38%
SEMY No data
Payout (12M)
LQDW $2.83
SEMY No data
Last payment
LQDW $0.38
SEMY $0.14
Ex-dividend
LQDW Oct 2, 2026
SEMY Oct 30, 2026
Paid on
LQDW Oct 7, 2026
SEMY Pays Nov 3, 2026
Frequency
LQDW Monthly
SEMY Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

LQDWMonthly · 9 paymentsAll LQDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments in 2026 YTD. Feb 3, 2026 $0.22; Mar 3, 2026 $0.16; Apr 2, 2026 $0.30; May 4, 2026 $0.17; Jun 2, 2026 $0.18; Jul 2, 2026 $0.19; Aug 4, 2026 $0.20; Sep 2, 2026 $0.15; Oct 2, 2026 $0.38. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
SEMYWeekly · 44 paymentsAll SEMY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 44 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 2, 2026 $0.53; Jan 9, 2026 $0.56; Jan 16, 2026 $0.55; Jan 23, 2026 $0.56; Jan 30, 2026 $0.57; Feb 6, 2026 $0.50; Feb 13, 2026 $0.53; Feb 20, 2026 $0.53; Feb 27, 2026 $0.55; Mar 6, 2026 $0.48; Mar 13, 2026 $0.48; Mar 20, 2026 $0.44; Mar 27, 2026 $0.44; Apr 2, 2026 $0.40; Apr 10, 2026 $0.41; Apr 17, 2026 $0.41; Apr 24, 2026 $0.41; May 1, 2026 $0.41; May 8, 2026 $0.43; May 15, 2026 $0.36; May 22, 2026 $0.31; May 29, 2026 $0.30; Jun 5, 2026 $0.30; Jun 12, 2026 $0.28; Jun 18, 2026 $0.30; Jun 26, 2026 $0.29; Jul 2, 2026 $0.29; Jul 10, 2026 $0.27; Jul 17, 2026 $0.27; Jul 24, 2026 $0.26; Jul 31, 2026 $0.18; Aug 7, 2026 $0.19; Aug 14, 2026 $0.19; Aug 21, 2026 $0.18; Aug 28, 2026 $0.17; Sep 4, 2026 $0.17; Sep 11, 2026 $0.18; Sep 18, 2026 $0.16; Sep 25, 2026 $0.17; Oct 2, 2026 $0.16; Oct 9, 2026 $0.16; Oct 16, 2026 $0.15; Oct 23, 2026 $0.14; Oct 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

LQDW vs SEMY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LQDW 4.2%SEMY No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LQDW 0.16SEMY No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LQDW −9.2%since Aug 2022SEMY No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LQDW 0.59SEMY 0.89

LQDW and SEMY in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LQDWAvsEFAAA

    iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF · Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEMYDvsEFAAA

    GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductor ETF · Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.14% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LQDWAvsKNGA

    iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF · FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEMYDvsKNGA

    GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductor ETF · FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.14% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LQDWAvsIDUBB

    iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF · Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEMYDvsIDUBB

    GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductor ETF · Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.