PANG ranks 3rd and LRCC 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
LRCC vs PANG
LRCC −0.31pt a year
0.45%0.76%
PANG 9.3×the volume
4.8K44.6K
LRCC vs PANG Performance
−41.4%+7.0%
- LRCC 0.45%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- LRCC $1M
- PANG $9M
- LRCC
- PANG +91.6%
- LRCC 1
- PANG 4
- LRCC 4.8K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- LRCC $9.70
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRCC | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | C52 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | D28 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F21 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. LRCC and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRCCC
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRCC vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRCC vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs LRCC
$5,615
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRCC 0.45%
$9,041
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRCC | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,353 | $541 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,142 | $2,014 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,656 | $5,615 |
- 0.45%LRCC, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
LRCC 7th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
LRCC vs PANG Dividends
- LRCC None
- PANG
- LRCC
- PANG $1.30
- LRCC
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- LRCC
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- LRCC
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
LRCC vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRCC PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LRCC PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- LRCC PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- LRCC 0.00PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.