SCHP ranks 1st and LTPZ 29th of 40 funds in the TIPS Category.
LTPZ vs SCHP
SCHP −0.17pt a year
0.20%0.03%
SCHP 12.3×the volume
457K5.63M
SCHP +2.5pt
−0.1%+2.4%
LTPZ vs SCHP Performance
−31.8%+1.2%
- LTPZ 0.20%
- SCHP 0.03%, better
- LTPZ $1.01B
- SCHP $17.5B
- LTPZ −6.6%
- SCHP +0.1%, better
- LTPZ 6.23%, better
- SCHP 4.89%
- LTPZ 17
- SCHP 49
- LTPZ 457K sh
- SCHP 5.63M sh, better
- LTPZ $47.38
- SCHP $25.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LTPZ | SCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A71 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F4 | D35Higher |
| Tradability | B57 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A76 | A82Higher |
Rank among TIPS funds
Same Category. LTPZ and SCHP are both graded against the same 40 TIPS funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LTPZC
SCHPA
In short
LTPZ Inflation protection with the duration dial cranked all the way up. LTPZ holds only TIPS maturing in 15 years or more, so it swings on long-term real yields far more than a whole-curve inflation fund.
SCHP Inflation insurance in the plainest wrapper available: SCHP owns the full maturity range of Treasury inflation-protected bonds and tracks its Bloomberg index for three basis points a year.
Stated mandate
LTPZ The fund seeks total returns that closely track, before fees and expenses, the return of its specified index. It uses representative sampling to obtain exposure to that index.
SCHP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index composed of inflation-protected U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LTPZ vs SCHP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LTPZ vs SCHP Cost
Overpaying LTPZ vs SCHP
$3,517
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LTPZ 0.20%
$4,155
SCHP 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LTPZ | SCHP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $55 | $310 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $216 | $1,205 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $638 | $3,517 |
- 0.20%LTPZ
- 0.03%SCHP, cheaper
- Middle half of TIPS funds
- Median 0.10%
SCHP cheapest of 40 funds
LTPZ 31st cheapest of 40 funds
LTPZ vs SCHP Dividends
- LTPZ 6.23%, better
- SCHP 4.89%
- LTPZ $2.96
- SCHP $1.26
- LTPZ $0.46
- SCHP $0.06
- LTPZ Aug 3, 2026
- SCHP Oct 1, 2026
- LTPZ Aug 5, 2026
- SCHP Oct 7, 2026
- LTPZ Monthly
- SCHP Monthly
Distribution history
LTPZ vs SCHP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LTPZ
- SCHP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LTPZ 11.5%SCHP 4.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LTPZ −0.09SCHP 0.09, better
- Worst fall
- LTPZ −41.0%SCHP −14.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LTPZ 1.95SCHP 0.70
LTPZ and SCHP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


