RACK ranks 3rd and LUMA 9th of 11 funds in the AI Data Infrastructure Category.
LUMA vs RACK
RACK −0.50pt a year
1.00%0.50%
RACK 2.3×the volume
16.6K38K
LUMA vs RACK Performance
−10.7%−6.1%
- LUMA 1.00%
- RACK 0.50%, better
- LUMA $8M
- RACK $71M
- LUMA 28
- RACK 52
- LUMA 16.6K sh
- RACK 38K sh, better
- LUMA $19.52
- RACK $43.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LUMA | RACK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F2 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D32 | C43Higher |
| Tradability | D35 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | A79Higher |
| Durability | D37 | B64Higher |
Rank among AI Data Infrastructure funds
Same Category. LUMA and RACK are both graded against the same 11 AI Data Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
LUMA vs RACK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LUMA vs RACK Cost
Overpaying LUMA vs RACK
$8,709
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LUMA 1.00%
$18,688
RACK 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LUMA | RACK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $900 | $863 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $3,460 | $3,165 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $9,979 | $8,709 |
- 1.00%LUMA
- 0.50%RACK, cheaper
- Middle half of AI Data Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.65%
RACK 2nd cheapest of 11 funds
LUMA 11th cheapest of 11 funds
LUMA vs RACK Dividends
- LUMA None
- RACK None
Distribution history
LUMA vs RACK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- LUMA 0.00RACK 2.45
LUMA and RACK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
