Skip to content

MARM vs PMDE

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March

MARMBCboe

PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December

PMDEBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PMDE −0.35pt a year

MARM0.85%PMDE0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

MARM 1.1×the volume

MARM4.73KPMDE4.31K

MARM vs PMDE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+4.9%MARM+4.9%PMDE

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MARM +4.9%. PMDE +4.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%3%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MARM 0.85%
PMDE 0.50%, better
Fund size
MARM $105M
PMDE $9M
1Y total return
MARM +6.0%
PMDE No data
Holdings
MARM 3
PMDE 4
Avg volume (30D)
MARM 4.73K sh, better
PMDE 4.31K sh
NAV per share
MARM $34.69
PMDE $26.41
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MARM: Cost 21, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 63, Durability 91. PMDE: Cost 76, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 40.
Pillar letters and Scores for MARM, PMDE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMARMPMDE
Cost30% weightF21A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherC50
Tradability15% weightA81HigherB58
Holdings10% weightB63Not scored
Durability5% weightA91HigherC40

Rank among S&P 500 Max Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MARM and PMDE are both graded against the same 20 S&P 500 Max Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Max Buffer⁠

Category · 20 funds
See all 20 ›

PMDE ranks 1st and MARM 10th of 20 funds in the S&P 500 Max Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BPMDEPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPMJLPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - JulyScore 56
  3. Rank 8BPMMYPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - MayScore 54
  4. Rank 10BMARMFT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - MarchScore 53
  5. Rank 10BPMAUPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - AugustScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MARMBFT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March

PMDEBPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December

In short

MARM The far end of the buffer spectrum: MARM aims for the biggest downside buffer the options market will fund on the S&P 500 ETF it references, and pays for it with a small cap on gains. Fresh terms every March.

PMDE PGIM's December-dated buffer fund aims to offset the entire one-year drop in SPY's price, not just the first slice, and gives up the upside above a cap reset each period. Heavy armor, low ceiling, 0.50% a year.

Stated mandate

MARM The fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF up to a cap while seeking the maximum available downside buffer over approximately one year. For March 23, 2026 through March 19, 2027, it targets a 77.82% loss buffer and a 7.00% gain cap.

PMDE The Fund seeks to track SPY’s price return up to a predetermined cap while seeking to maximize protection from SPY losses over a one-year Target Outcome Period.

Why people hold it

  • MARM Protection is the headline. The mandate is the maximum available downside buffer over roughly a year, not the modest slice most buffer funds carve out.ftportfolios.com
  • The calendar does the work. A new cap and buffer are struck each March and run about twelve months, so the terms are set before the period begins.ftportfolios.com
  • At 0.85% a year it charges the same as the other funds built on the same SPDR S&P 500 reference, DHDG and SQMX, and less than BUFD at 0.95%.
  • The ride has been at the gentle end of its buffer peer group since the 2024 launch, which is exactly what a buffer this size is engineered to produce.
  • PMDE Full-armor design: it seeks to offset SPY's whole price decline across a one-year outcome period, where most buffer funds absorb only an initial slice of the fall.pgim.com
  • Costs 0.50% a year against a 0.79% median for S&P 500 buffer funds, undercutting December-dated rivals like PDEC (0.79%).
  • The reference is SPY itself, so the payoff keys off a price you can watch all day, and the outcome period resets on a set annual schedule with nothing for you to roll.pgim.com

Worth knowing

  • MARM The cap is what pays for the buffer, so big index years get left largely behind. It also follows price return only, so index dividends do not flow through.
  • That 0.85% sits above the median fee in its buffer cohort, and laddered options like PSFF (0.10%) and BUFP (0.50%) deliver risk-managed equity exposure for far less.
  • Thinly traded, and the stated cap and buffer run from the March reset. Buy mid-period and your own numbers differ from the headline terms, so limit orders earn their keep.
  • PMDE Maximum protection is paid for with a low ceiling: gains stop at a cap set when each period starts, and buying mid-period leaves you with a different cap and buffer than the headline terms.
  • It tracks SPY's price return, so S&P 500 dividends don't flow through and the fund isn't built as an income payer.
  • Launched in late 2025 and still a small, lightly traded fund, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the veterans of the buffer aisle.

Full MARM profile⁠

Full PMDE profile⁠

MARM vs PMDE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MARM vs PMDE Cost

Overpaying MARM vs PMDE

$6,220

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MARM 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PMDE 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MARM 0.85%
  • PMDE 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MARM $16,199PMDE $9,979

Year by year

YearMARMPMDEOverpaying
10$1,508$900$608
20$5,706$3,460$2,246
30$16,199$9,979$6,220

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%MARM
  • 0.50%PMDE, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Max Buffer funds
  • Median 0.52%

PMDE cheapest of 20 funds

MARM 12th cheapest of 20 funds

MARM vs PMDE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
MARM None
PMDE None

Distribution history

MARMAll MARM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PMDEAll PMDE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MARM vs PMDE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MARM 1.9%since Apr 2024PMDE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MARM 1.28since Apr 2024PMDE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MARM −2.7%since Mar 2024PMDE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MARM 0.12PMDE 0.17

Popular comparisons

  • MARMBvsPMJLB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMDEBvsPMJLB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARMBvsPMSEB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMDEBvsPMSEB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARMBvsPMJNB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMDEBvsPMJNB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.