PMDE ranks 1st and MARM 10th of 20 funds in the S&P 500 Max Buffer Category.
MARM vs PMDE
PMDE −0.35pt a year
0.85%0.50%
MARM 1.1×the volume
4.73K4.31K
MARM vs PMDE Performance
+4.9%+4.9%
- MARM 0.85%
- PMDE 0.50%, better
- MARM $105M
- PMDE $9M
- MARM +6.0%
- PMDE
- MARM 3
- PMDE 4
- MARM 4.73K sh, better
- PMDE 4.31K sh
- MARM $34.69
- PMDE $26.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MARM | PMDE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A79Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | A91Higher | C40 |
Rank among S&P 500 Max Buffer funds
Same Category. MARM and PMDE are both graded against the same 20 S&P 500 Max Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MARMB
PMDEB
In short
MARM The far end of the buffer spectrum: MARM aims for the biggest downside buffer the options market will fund on the S&P 500 ETF it references, and pays for it with a small cap on gains. Fresh terms every March.
PMDE PGIM's December-dated buffer fund aims to offset the entire one-year drop in SPY's price, not just the first slice, and gives up the upside above a cap reset each period. Heavy armor, low ceiling, 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
MARM The fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF up to a cap while seeking the maximum available downside buffer over approximately one year. For March 23, 2026 through March 19, 2027, it targets a 77.82% loss buffer and a 7.00% gain cap.
PMDE The Fund seeks to track SPY’s price return up to a predetermined cap while seeking to maximize protection from SPY losses over a one-year Target Outcome Period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MARM vs PMDE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MARM vs PMDE Cost
Overpaying MARM vs PMDE
$6,220
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MARM 0.85%
$16,199
PMDE 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MARM | PMDE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $900 | $608 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,460 | $2,246 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,979 | $6,220 |
- 0.85%MARM
- 0.50%PMDE, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Max Buffer funds
- Median 0.52%
PMDE cheapest of 20 funds
MARM 12th cheapest of 20 funds
MARM vs PMDE Dividends
- MARM None
- PMDE None
Distribution history
MARM vs PMDE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MARM 1.9%PMDE
- Return per unit of risk
- MARM 1.28PMDE
- Worst fall
- MARM −2.7%PMDE
- Market sensitivity
- MARM 0.12PMDE 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.