Skip to content
etf.net

MARU vs PSMO

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF

MARUDCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.25pt a year

MARU0.74%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSMO 6.1×the volume

MARU1.19KPSMO7.3K

MARU vs PSMO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.3%MARU+10.0%PSMO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MARU +6.3%. PSMO +10.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MARU 0.74%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
MARU $35M
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
MARU +6.3%
PSMO +10.0%, better
Holdings
MARU 2
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
MARU 1.19K sh
PSMO 7.3K sh, better
NAV per share
MARU $30.13
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MARU: Cost 51, Risk 11, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 56, Durability 30. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for MARU, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMARUPSMO
Cost30% weightC51A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightF11C54Higher
Tradability15% weightD27B64Higher
Holdings10% weightB56Not scored
Durability5% weightD30B66Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MARU and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and MARU 48th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 46DSPBUAllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETFScore 38
  4. Rank 48DMARUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETFScore 37
  5. Rank 49DNVBUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MARUDAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

MARU No data

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

MARU No data

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

MARU No data

  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

MARU No data

  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full MARU profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

MARU vs PSMO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MARU vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying MARU vs PSMO

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MARU 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MARU 0.74%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MARU $14,307PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearMARUPSMOOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%MARU
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

MARU 18th cheapest of 51 funds

MARU vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
MARU None
PSMO None

Distribution history

MARUAll MARU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MARU vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MARU 8.5%since Apr 2025PSMO 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MARU 1.14since Apr 2025PSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MARU −8.5%since Mar 2025PSMO −9.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MARU 0.71PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • MARUDvsPSMJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MARUDvsPSMRB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MARUDvsBUFCB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.