WTV ranks 2nd and MAVF 60th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
MAVF vs WTV
WTV −0.63pt a year
0.75%0.12%
WTV 220.3×the volume
760167K
MAVF vs WTV Performance
+17.3%+21.6%
- MAVF 0.75%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- MAVF $91M
- WTV $3.33B
- MAVF +17.3%
- WTV +21.6%, better
- MAVF
- WTV 1.99%
- MAVF 27
- WTV 126
- MAVF 760 sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- MAVF $136.25
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MAVF | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A100Higher |
| Mission | B62 | |
| Risk | F22 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. MAVF and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MAVFF
WTVA
In short
MAVF A 1996-vintage value strategy wearing an ETF ticker. Matrix picks US stocks by its own definition of cheap, aiming at appreciation and income both. Old-school active work in an aisle now ruled by rules-based screens.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
MAVF The Fund seeks total return through capital appreciation and current income.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MAVF vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MAVF vs WTV Cost
Overpaying MAVF vs WTV
$11,962
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MAVF 0.75%
$14,482
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MAVF | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $220 | $1,116 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $859 | $4,219 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $2,520 | $11,962 |
- 0.75%MAVF
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
MAVF 53rd cheapest of 64 funds
MAVF vs WTV Dividends
- MAVF
- WTV 1.99%
- MAVF
- WTV $2.14
- MAVF $0.52
- WTV $0.55
- MAVF Dec 23, 2025
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- MAVF Dec 24, 2025
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- MAVF Irregular
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
MAVF vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MAVF 14.4%WTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- MAVF 1.01WTV 1.33
- Worst fall
- MAVF −16.4%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- MAVF 1.05WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.