VCRM ranks 2nd and MBND 57th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MBND vs VCRM
VCRM −0.28pt a year
0.40%0.12%
VCRM 51.1×the volume
14.3K730K
MBND vs VCRM Performance
+0.6%+2.3%
- MBND 0.40%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- MBND $20M
- VCRM $2.2B
- MBND +0.6%
- VCRM +2.3%, better
- MBND 3.54%
- VCRM 3.75%, better
- MBND 65
- VCRM 2595
- MBND 14.3K sh
- VCRM 730K sh, better
- MBND $26.85
- VCRM $74.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MBND | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A89Higher |
| Mission | B60 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B59 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | F12 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | A81Higher |
| Durability | D39 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MBND and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MBNDD
VCRMA
In short
MBND A muni fund that picks rather than tracks: roughly 70 bonds chosen for value and yield, benchmarked to the intermediate 3-15 year part of the curve, with federally tax-exempt income paid monthly.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
MBND The fund seeks broad exposure to municipal bonds providing income exempt from federal income taxes and uses an active approach focused on higher-yielding, undervalued bonds with above-average total-return potential.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MBND vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MBND vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying MBND vs VCRM
$5,570
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MBND 0.40%
$8,090
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MBND | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $220 | $503 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $859 | $1,934 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $2,520 | $5,570 |
- 0.40%MBND
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
MBND 51st cheapest of 63 funds
MBND vs VCRM Dividends
- MBND 3.54%
- VCRM 3.75%, better
- MBND $0.94
- VCRM $2.80
- MBND $0.08
- VCRM $0.21
- MBND Nov 2, 2026
- VCRM Nov 2, 2026
- MBND Nov 5, 2026
- VCRM Nov 4, 2026
- MBND Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
MBND vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MBND 5.5%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MBND −0.06VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- MBND −12.5%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- MBND 0.84VCRM 0.17
MBND and VCRM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
