MFSV vs SEIV: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

MFS Active Value ETF

MFSVBNYSE

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

SEIVACboe

Overlap

7.5%by weight

Expense ratio

SEIV −0.29pt a year

MFSV0.44%SEIV0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

SEIV 1.3×the volume

MFSV108KSEIV141K

MFSV vs SEIV Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+17.8%MFSV+27.7%SEIV

Expense ratio: MFSV 0.44%; SEIV 0.15%, better
Fund size: MFSV $669M; SEIV $1.62B
1Y total return: MFSV +17.8%; SEIV +27.7%, better
Yield (12M): MFSV 1.33%; SEIV 1.57%, better
Holdings: MFSV 63; SEIV 123
Avg volume (30D): MFSV 108K sh; SEIV 141K sh, better
NAV per share: MFSV $29.77; SEIV $49.57
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for MFSV, SEIV, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	MFSV	SEIV
Cost30% weight	B67	A98Higher
Mission25% weight	Not scored	A82
Risk15% weight	A70Higher	B65
Tradability15% weight	B61	A91Higher
Holdings10% weight	B57	A76Higher
Durability5% weight	B58	A75Higher

Rank among US Active Value funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. MFSV and SEIV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds

See all 64 ›

SEIV ranks 3rd and MFSV 14th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
Rank 1AWTVWisdomTree U.S. Value FundScore 86
Rank 3ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 85
Rank 4ADFLVDimensional US Large Cap Value ETFScore 84
Rank 14BJAVAJPMorgan Active Value ETFScore 64
Rank 14BMFSVMFS Active Value ETFScore 64
Rank 17BESLVEventide Large Cap Value ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MFSVBMFS Active Value ETF

SEIVASEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

In short

MFSV No data

SEIV Active quant value stock-picking at an index-fund price. SEIV screens U.S. large caps for cheap valuations plus quality, momentum and low volatility, then runs a concentrated book of roughly 80 names for 0.15% a year.

Stated mandate

MFSV No data

SEIV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S. common stocks priced below fundamental valuation measures, using a quantitative, active stock-selection approach.

Why people hold it

MFSV No data

SEIV 0.15% a year for genuine active selection, against a 0.55% median in its U.S. value peer group. It matches the cheapest large-value quant funds rather than charging active prices.
Value is not the only screen. The model also weighs quality, momentum and low volatility, which is how a cheap-stock strategy tries to avoid the cheap-for-a-reason trap.
Other funds measured against the S&P 500 in this cohort charge far more (LSVD 0.40%, GSPY 0.50%, VNSE 1.34%). SEIV runs its version at 0.15%.
Sits among the strongest implementations in a crowded U.S. value field, and trades with enough regular activity to be workable for ordinary retail order sizes.

Worth knowing

MFSV No data

SEIV About 80 stocks measured against a 500-name benchmark. That concentration means stretches where it looks nothing like the S&P 500, in either direction.
Launched in 2022, so the live record is short, and the asset base is mid-sized rather than among the giants of the value aisle.
You get the factor recipe, not the trade-by-trade logic: selection sits inside a quantitative model. Distributions land quarterly, not monthly.

Full MFSV profile⁠

Full SEIV profile⁠

MFSV vs SEIV Holdings

How MFSV and SEIV differ

Overlap by weight

7.5%

Shared holdings make up 16.9% of MFSV and 7.9% of SEIV.

Level by level

Holdings5 in both7.5%
Sector11 Sectors72.3%
Countryby domicile98.5%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in MFSV and SEIV, widest gap first
Sector	More in MFSVMore in SEIV	MFSV	SEIV
Technology	SEIV +16.8 points	16.1%	32.9%
Communication	SEIV +10.3 points	0.8%	11.2%
Industrials	MFSV +9.4 points	13.4%	4.0%
Financials	MFSV +5.2 points	22.4%	17.2%
Energy	MFSV +3.6 points	7.3%	3.7%
Health Care	MFSV +3.1 points	14.9%	11.8%
Consumer Staples	MFSV +2.8 points	4.7%	1.9%
Utilities	MFSV +2.2 points	8.3%	6.1%
Real Estate	MFSV +1.3 points	1.6%	0.3%
Materials	SEIV +0.4 points	0.8%	1.2%
Consumer Discretionary	MFSV +0.1 points	9.8%	9.7%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MFSV and SEIV, widest gap first
Country	More in MFSVMore in SEIV	MFSV	SEIV
Mexico	SEIV +1.1 points	0.0%	1.1%
United States	MFSV +1.0 points	99.5%	98.5%
United Kingdom	MFSV +0.5 points	0.5%	0.0%
Brazil	SEIV +0.4 points	0.0%	0.4%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

MFSV32.6%
SEIV25.1%

Securities held

MFSV62
SEIV122

Asset class

MFSV: Equity
SEIV: Equity

Holdings

Only in MFSV57
In both5
Only in SEIV117

Only in MFSV

57 securities, 82.3% of MFSV by weight

JPMorgan Chase & Co4.00%
Exxonmobilholdings Corp3.28%
The Cignagroup2.77%
Chevron Corp2.41%
Conocophillips2.28%
Rtx Corp2.20%
Duke Energy Corp2.06%
Bank of America Corp2.01%
Progressive Corp1.96%
Nasdaq Inc1.92%
Analog Devices Inc1.91%
Union Pacific Corp1.88%
Morgan Stanley1.87%
Abbott Laboratories1.87%
Travelerscos Inc/The1.80%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings In1.77%
Wells Fargo & Co1.77%
Aon PLC Class A1.73%
Dominion Energy Inc1.68%
Johnson +johnson1.65%
AbbVie Inc1.61%
General Dynamics Corp1.60%
American Express Co1.55%
Nxp Semiconductors NV1.47%
Alliant Energy Corp1.46%
Prologis Inc1.46%
Kkr & Co Inc1.46%
Boeing Co/The1.46%
Southern Co/The1.42%
Home Depotinc1.42%
Hartford Insurance Group Inc1.40%
Ingersollrand Inc1.39%
Eaton Corpplc1.37%
Equifax Inc1.35%
Procter +gamble Co/The1.28%
Kla Corp1.25%
Kimberly Clark Corp1.16%
Xcel Energy Inc1.15%
Philip Morris International1.09%
Boston Scientific Corp1.04%
Mondelez International Inc A1.00%
Paccar Inc1.00%
Steris PLC0.97%
Cms Energycorp0.93%
Ebay Inc0.93%
Salesforceinc0.91%
Honeywellinternational Inc0.89%
Texas Instruments Inc0.86%
Crh PLC0.78%
Alphabet Inc Class A0.65%

Only in SEIV

117 securities, 91.6% of SEIV by weight

NVIDIA Corp3.58%
General Motors Co2.53%
Cardinal Health Inc2.53%
Verizon Communications Inc2.30%
Micron Technology Inc2.25%
Prudential Financial Inc2.08%
Citigroup Inc2.02%
Alphabet Inc-Cl C2.00%
Cvs Health Corp1.91%
Adobe Inc1.90%
Hp Inc1.85%
Synchrony Financial1.84%
AT&T Inc1.67%
Exelon Corp1.66%
Edison International1.57%
Ford Motor Co1.56%
Expand Energy Corp1.49%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise1.43%
United Airlines Holdings Inc1.42%
Cognizant Tech Solutions-A1.38%
Tenet Healthcare Corp1.36%
Qualcomm Inc1.28%
Netapp Inc1.27%
Everest Group Ltd1.21%
Apa Corp1.17%
Reinsurance Group of America1.16%
Gen Digital Inc1.11%
Ovintiv Inc1.07%
Unum Group1.05%
Flex Ltd1.01%
Renaissancere Holdings Ltd0.98%
Expedia Group Inc0.97%
Skyworks Solutions Inc0.93%
Carnival Corp Ltd0.91%
Comcast Corp-Class A0.90%
Viatris Inc0.88%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.86%
Leidos Holdings Inc0.86%
Kroger Co0.86%
Crown Holdings Inc0.85%
Eversource Energy0.82%
P G & E Corp0.81%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co0.81%
Td Synnex Corp0.78%
Fox Corp - Class A0.78%
Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC0.78%
Incyte Corp0.74%
Ally Financial Inc0.74%
Zoom Communications Inc0.73%
Alcoa Corp0.72%

Weight gaps

All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in MFSV and SEIV, widest gap first
Holding	More in MFSVMore in SEIV	MFSV	SEIV
Amazon.comincAMZN	MFSV +4.62 points	4.98%	0.36%
MicrosoftcorpMSFT	MFSV +3.22 points	5.48%	2.26%
Pfizer IncPFE	MFSV +0.87 points	1.42%	0.55%
Mckesson CorpMCK	MFSV +0.68 points	1.89%	1.21%
Apple IncAAPL	SEIV +0.41 points	3.13%	3.54%

All MFSV holdings⁠All 122 SEIV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MFSV vs SEIV Cost

Overpaying MFSV vs SEIV

$5,715

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

MFSV 0.44%
$8,852
SEIV 0.15%
$3,137

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

MFSV 0.44%
SEIV 0.15%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	MFSV	SEIV	Overpaying
10	$794	$274	$520
20	$3,061	$1,071	$1,990
30	$8,852	$3,137	$5,715

Expense ratio

0.44%MFSV
0.15%SEIV, cheaper

SEIV0.15%MFSV0.44%

0.12%1.25%

Middle half of US Active Value funds
Median 0.54%

SEIV 2nd cheapest of 64 funds

MFSV 21st cheapest of 64 funds

MFSV vs SEIV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): MFSV 1.33%; SEIV 1.57%, better
Payout (12M): MFSV $0.40; SEIV $0.78
Last payment: MFSV $0.09; SEIV $0.21
Ex-dividend: MFSV Sep 24, 2026; SEIV Oct 5, 2026
Paid on: MFSV Sep 25, 2026; SEIV Oct 6, 2026
Frequency: MFSV Quarterly; SEIV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

MFSVQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll MFSV payments⁠

SEIVQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll SEIV payments⁠

MFSV vs SEIV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: MFSV 10.2%since Jan 2025SEIV 12.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: MFSV 1.02since Jan 2025SEIV 1.80
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: MFSV −12.7%since Dec 2024SEIV −18.2%since May 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: MFSV 0.34SEIV 0.89; Market = 1

MFSV and SEIV in the news

All news⁠

Filings Digest
Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF, SMRZ, went effective, and the firm says it launched
Oct 16, 2026MFSV
Best ETFs
The best value ETF depends on whose list you bought
Updated Oct 2, 2026SEIV

Popular comparisons

MFSVBvsAVLVA
MFS Active Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.44% · 0.15%
Category
SEIVAvsAVLVA
SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.15%
Category
MFSVBvsWTVA
MFS Active Value ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund
Expense ratio
0.44% · 0.12%
Category
SEIVAvsWTVA
SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.12%
Category
MFSVBvsDFLVA
MFS Active Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.44% · 0.21%
Category
SEIVAvsDFLVA
SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.21%
Category

MFSV vs SEIV

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How MFSV and SEIV differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in MFSV

Only in SEIV

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF, SMRZ, went effective, and the firm says it launched

The best value ETF depends on whose list you bought