MFSV vs WTV: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

MFS Active Value ETF

MFSVBNYSE

WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

WTVANYSE Arca

Overlap

14.2%by weight

Expense ratio

WTV −0.32pt a year

MFSV0.44%WTV0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

WTV 1.6×the volume

MFSV108KWTV167K

MFSV vs WTV Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+17.8%MFSV+20.9%WTV

Expense ratio: MFSV 0.44%; WTV 0.12%, better
Fund size: MFSV $669M; WTV $3.33B
1Y total return: MFSV +17.8%; WTV +20.9%, better
Yield (12M): MFSV 1.33%; WTV 2.00%, better
Holdings: MFSV 63; WTV 126
Avg volume (30D): MFSV 108K sh; WTV 167K sh, better
NAV per share: MFSV $29.77; WTV $106.90
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for MFSV, WTV, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	MFSV	WTV
Cost30% weight	B67	A100Higher
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	A70Higher	B56
Tradability15% weight	B61	A89Higher
Holdings10% weight	B57	A84Higher
Durability5% weight	B58	A90Higher

Rank among US Active Value funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. MFSV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds

See all 64 ›

WTV ranks 1st and MFSV 14th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
Rank 1AWTVWisdomTree U.S. Value FundScore 86
Rank 3ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 85
Rank 14BJAVAJPMorgan Active Value ETFScore 64
Rank 14BMFSVMFS Active Value ETFScore 64
Rank 17BESLVEventide Large Cap Value ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MFSVBMFS Active Value ETF

WTVAWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

In short

MFSV No data

WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.

Stated mandate

MFSV No data

WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.

Why people hold it

MFSV No data

WTV Charges 0.12% a year, under a quarter of the 0.55% typical for active US value funds, and less than every same-benchmark rival in its group (JAVA 0.44%, CGVV 0.33%, TEQI 0.54%).
"Value" here means cash returned: dividend yield plus net buyback yield, with quality and profitability screens, rather than a plain low price-to-book sort.wisdomtree.com
About 160 US stocks, a multi-billion-dollar asset base, and a live track record dating to 2007. Distributions land quarterly.

Worth knowing

MFSV No data

WTV Full equity with no downside cushion, and a value tilt that can lean into a handful of sectors. Risk is the least polished part of the profile.
Rules-based active, not an index tracker, so results can diverge from the Russell 1000 Value in either direction.
Buybacks supply much of the shareholder yield, and companies can scale repurchases back more easily than they cut dividends.wisdomtree.com

Full MFSV profile⁠

Full WTV profile⁠

MFSV vs WTV Holdings

How MFSV and WTV differ

Overlap by weight

14.2%

Shared holdings make up 29.3% of MFSV and 15.6% of WTV.

Level by level

Holdings16 in both14.2%
Sector11 Sectors81.3%
Countryby domicile99.5%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in MFSV and WTV, widest gap first
Sector	More in MFSVMore in WTV	MFSV	WTV
Communication	WTV +6.6 points	0.8%	7.5%
Health Care	MFSV +5.8 points	14.9%	9.1%
Industrials	MFSV +5.0 points	13.4%	8.4%
Utilities	MFSV +3.7 points	8.3%	4.6%
Consumer Staples	WTV +3.7 points	4.7%	8.4%
Consumer Discretionary	MFSV +3.5 points	9.8%	6.3%
Technology	WTV +3.3 points	16.1%	19.4%
Real Estate	WTV +2.4 points	1.6%	4.0%
Materials	WTV +2.0 points	0.8%	2.8%
Energy	WTV +0.6 points	7.3%	7.9%
Financials	MFSV +0.6 points	22.4%	21.8%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MFSV and WTV, widest gap first
Country	More in MFSVMore in WTV	MFSV	WTV
United Kingdom	MFSV +0.5 points	0.5%	0.0%
Sweden	WTV +0.5 points	0.0%	0.5%
United States	Same weight	99.5%	99.5%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

MFSV32.6%
WTV21.1%

Securities held

MFSV62
WTV124

Asset class

MFSV: Equity
WTV: Equity

Holdings

Only in MFSV46
In both16
Only in WTV108

Only in MFSV

46 securities, 69.9% of MFSV by weight

Microsoftcorp5.48%
Amazon.cominc4.98%
JPMorgan Chase & Co4.00%
Apple Inc3.13%
Rtx Corp2.20%
Nasdaq Inc1.92%
Analog Devices Inc1.91%
Mckesson Corp1.89%
Union Pacific Corp1.88%
Abbott Laboratories1.87%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings In1.77%
Aon PLC Class A1.73%
Dominion Energy Inc1.68%
Johnson +johnson1.65%
AbbVie Inc1.61%
General Dynamics Corp1.60%
American Express Co1.55%
Nxp Semiconductors NV1.47%
Alliant Energy Corp1.46%
Prologis Inc1.46%
Kkr & Co Inc1.46%
Boeing Co/The1.46%
Southern Co/The1.42%
Home Depotinc1.42%
Ingersollrand Inc1.39%
Eaton Corpplc1.37%
Procter +gamble Co/The1.28%
Kla Corp1.25%
Xcel Energy Inc1.15%
Philip Morris International1.09%
Boston Scientific Corp1.04%
Mondelez International Inc A1.00%
Paccar Inc1.00%
Steris PLC0.97%
Cms Energycorp0.93%
Ebay Inc0.93%
Texas Instruments Inc0.86%
Crh PLC0.78%
Alphabet Inc Class A0.65%
Humana Inc0.61%
Coca Colaeuropacific Partne0.55%
Lpl Financial Holdings Inc0.48%
Medline Inc Class A0.42%
Medtronicplc0.41%
Tjx Companies Inc0.37%
Elevance Health Inc0.34%

Only in WTV

108 securities, 84.3% of WTV by weight

Nvidia Corp3.20%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.73%
Target Corp1.88%
Merck & Co Inc/NJ1.78%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc1.78%
Newmont Mining Corp1.74%
Cisco Systems Inc1.74%
Citigroup Inc1.54%
Southwest Airlines Co1.52%
Altria Group Inc1.39%
Adobe Inc1.28%
Meta PlatformsInc. Cl A1.26%
Ryder System Inc1.25%
UnitedHealth Group Inc1.20%
Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc1.18%
priceline.com Inc1.17%
Verizon Communications Inc1.12%
NetFlix Inc1.09%
Healthpeak Properties Inc1.07%
Halliburton Co1.02%
Zoom Video Communications-A1.01%
Molson Coors Beverage Co1.01%
Affiliated Managers Group Inc1.00%
Regions Financial Corp0.98%
Rexford Industrial Realty Inc0.98%
Match Group Inc0.96%
Qualcomm Inc0.95%
Dell Technologies -C0.94%
Edison International0.92%
HCA Healthcare Inc0.88%
Paycom Software Inc0.88%
AT&T Inc0.88%
Kraft Foods Inc0.86%
Valero Energy Corp0.85%
Phillips 660.85%
Franklin Resources Inc0.83%
Becton Dickinson and Co0.82%
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Co0.79%
Maplebear Inc0.79%
Kroger Co/The0.79%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp0.78%
Cognizant Technology Solutions0.75%
Darden Restaurants Inc0.74%
Fortive Corp0.71%
Hewlett-Packard Co0.71%
WP Carey Inc0.71%
Roper Technologies Inc0.70%
Walt Disney Co/The0.70%
GoDaddy Inc - Class A0.69%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities0.68%

Weight gaps

All 16 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in MFSV and WTV, widest gap first
Holding	More in MFSVMore in WTV	MFSV	WTV
Exxonmobilholdings CorpXOM	MFSV +2.24 points	3.28%	1.04%
The CignagroupCI	MFSV +1.79 points	2.77%	0.98%
Bank of America CorpBAC	MFSV +1.49 points	2.01%	0.52%
Duke Energy CorpDUK	MFSV +1.43 points	2.06%	0.63%
SalesforceincCRM	WTV +1.32 points	0.91%	2.23%
Progressive CorpPGR	MFSV +1.18 points	1.96%	0.78%
Wells Fargo & CoWFC	MFSV +1.17 points	1.77%	0.60%
Travelerscos Inc/TheTRV	MFSV +1.00 points	1.80%	0.80%
ConocophillipsCOP	MFSV +0.95 points	2.28%	1.33%
Hartford Insurance Group IncHIG	MFSV +0.92 points	1.40%	0.48%
Equifax IncEFX	MFSV +0.84 points	1.35%	0.51%
Morgan StanleyMS	MFSV +0.74 points	1.87%	1.13%
Pfizer IncPFE	MFSV +0.53 points	1.42%	0.89%
Honeywellinternational IncHON	MFSV +0.46 points	0.89%	0.43%
Kimberly Clark CorpKMB	MFSV +0.44 points	1.16%	0.72%
Chevron CorpCVX	WTV +0.07 points	2.41%	2.48%

All MFSV holdings⁠All 157 WTV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MFSV vs WTV Cost

Overpaying MFSV vs WTV

$6,332

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

MFSV 0.44%
$8,852
WTV 0.12%
$2,520

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

MFSV 0.44%
WTV 0.12%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	MFSV	WTV	Overpaying
10	$794	$220	$574
20	$3,061	$859	$2,202
30	$8,852	$2,520	$6,332

Expense ratio

0.44%MFSV
0.12%WTV, cheaper

WTV0.12%MFSV0.44%

0.12%1.25%

Middle half of US Active Value funds
Median 0.54%

WTV cheapest of 64 funds

MFSV 21st cheapest of 64 funds

MFSV vs WTV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): MFSV 1.33%; WTV 2.00%, better
Payout (12M): MFSV $0.40; WTV $2.14
Last payment: MFSV $0.09; WTV $0.55
Ex-dividend: MFSV Sep 24, 2026; WTV Sep 25, 2026
Paid on: MFSV Sep 25, 2026; WTV Sep 29, 2026
Frequency: MFSV Quarterly; WTV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

MFSVQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll MFSV payments⁠

WTVQuarterly · 43 paymentsAll WTV payments⁠

MFSV vs WTV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: MFSV 10.2%since Jan 2025WTV 13.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: MFSV 1.02since Jan 2025WTV 1.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: MFSV −12.7%since Dec 2024WTV −19.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: MFSV 0.34WTV 0.94; Market = 1

MFSV and WTV in the news

All news⁠

Filings Digest
Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF, SMRZ, went effective, and the firm says it launched
Oct 16, 2026MFSV

Popular comparisons

MFSVBvsAVLVA
MFS Active Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.44% · 0.15%
Category
WTVAvsAVLVA
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.15%
Category
MFSVBvsSEIVA
MFS Active Value ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF
Expense ratio
0.44% · 0.15%
Category
WTVAvsSEIVA
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.15%
Category
MFSVBvsDFLVA
MFS Active Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.44% · 0.21%
Category
WTVAvsDFLVA
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.21%
Category

MFSV vs WTV

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How MFSV and WTV differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in MFSV

Only in WTV

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF, SMRZ, went effective, and the firm says it launched