MGC ranks 1st and SIXA 6th of 6 funds in the US Mega-Cap Category.
MGC vs SIXA
MGC −0.41pt a year
0.05%0.46%
MGC 6.1×the volume
88.5K14.5K
SIXA +0.5pt
+12.6%+13.1%
MGC vs SIXA Performance
+80.6%+85.4%
- MGC 0.05%, better
- SIXA 0.46%
- MGC $11B
- SIXA $564M
- MGC +11.2%
- SIXA +22.2%, better
- MGC 0.93%
- SIXA 1.93%, better
- MGC 167
- SIXA 49
- MGC 88.5K sh, better
- SIXA 14.5K sh
- MGC $276.86
- SIXA $58.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MGC | SIXA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F15 |
| Mission | A98Higher | F23 |
| Risk | C45 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | C50Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | B57 | B68Higher |
| Durability | A78Higher | D26 |
Rank among US Mega-Cap funds
Same Category. MGC and SIXA are both graded against the same 6 US Mega-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MGCA
SIXAD
In short
MGC Mega cap without the guesswork. MGC owns roughly 190 of the largest US companies for 0.05% a year, a fraction of what most rivals in its aisle charge, and has run that way since 2007.
SIXA Most mega-cap funds just buy the biggest companies. SIXA is actively managed: it screens the largest 10% of the Russell 3000 on beta, momentum, yield, value and quality down to roughly 50 names, at 0.46% with no waiver in place.
Stated mandate
MGC The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Mega Cap Index and provide diversified exposure to the largest U.S. stocks through passive full replication.
SIXA The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MGC vs SIXA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MGC vs SIXA Cost
Overpaying SIXA vs MGC
$8,170
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MGC 0.05%
$1,060
SIXA 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MGC | SIXA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $830 | $738 |
| 20 | $360 | $3,195 | $2,835 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $9,230 | $8,170 |
- 0.05%MGC, cheaper
- 0.46%SIXA
- Middle half of US Mega-Cap funds
- Median 0.17%
MGC cheapest of 6 funds
SIXA 6th cheapest of 6 funds
MGC vs SIXA Dividends
- MGC 0.93%
- SIXA 1.93%, better
- MGC $2.58
- SIXA $1.13
- MGC $0.65
- SIXA $0.17
- MGC Sep 28, 2026
- SIXA Oct 28, 2026
- MGC Sep 30, 2026
- SIXA Oct 30, 2026
- MGC Quarterly
- SIXA Monthly
Distribution history
MGC vs SIXA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MGC
- SIXA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MGC 13.0%SIXA 9.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MGC 1.41SIXA 1.85, better
- Worst fall
- MGC −25.8%SIXA −18.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- MGC 1.02SIXA 0.56
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.