MGV ranks 1st and NULC 9th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
MGV vs NULC
MGV −0.16pt a year
0.05%0.21%
MGV 61.3×the volume
247K4.03K
MGV +3.5pt
+12.9%+9.4%
MGV vs NULC Performance
+83.6%+56.9%
- MGV 0.05%, better
- NULC 0.21%
- MGV $13.6B
- NULC $80M
- MGV +25.6%, better
- NULC +14.6%
- MGV 1.82%
- NULC 8.85%, better
- MGV 117
- NULC 129
- MGV 247K sh, better
- NULC 4.03K sh
- MGV $168.92
- NULC $54.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MGV | NULC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A72 |
| Mission | B67 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A92Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | C49Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | B57Higher | C51 |
| Durability | A90Higher | D32 |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. MGV and NULC are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MGVA
NULCB
In short
MGV Most "value" ETFs slide down into mid caps. MGV stays at the very top of the US market and buys the value half of it for five basis points. Vanguard's plain, cheap way to own the old-guard giants.
NULC An ESG screen on a growth-tilted US large-cap portfolio: roughly 140 names tracking the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Index at 0.21% a year, under the typical US factor fund's fee.
Stated mandate
MGV The ETF seeks to track the Morningstar US Mega Cap Value Index and provides passive, diversified exposure to the largest value stocks in the U.S. market.
NULC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MGV vs NULC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MGV vs NULC Cost
Overpaying NULC vs MGV
$3,297
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MGV 0.05%
$1,060
NULC 0.21%
$4,357
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MGV | NULC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $383 | $291 |
| 20 | $360 | $1,491 | $1,131 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $4,357 | $3,297 |
- 0.05%MGV, cheaper
- 0.21%NULC
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
MGV cheapest of 30 funds
NULC 9th cheapest of 30 funds
MGV vs NULC Dividends
- MGV 1.82%
- NULC 8.85%, better
- MGV $3.07
- NULC $4.87
- MGV $0.72
- NULC $4.87
- MGV Sep 28, 2026
- NULC Dec 18, 2025
- MGV Sep 30, 2026
- NULC Dec 19, 2025
- MGV Quarterly
- NULC Annual
Distribution history
MGV vs NULC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MGV
- NULC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MGV 11.1%, betterNULC 12.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- MGV 1.48, betterNULC 1.27
- Worst fall
- MGV −16.5%, betterNULC −27.9%
- Market sensitivity
- MGV 0.66NULC 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.