SIZE ranks 3rd and NULC 8th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
NULC vs SIZE
SIZE −0.06pt a year
0.21%0.15%
SIZE 1.3×the volume
4.03K5.21K
NULC +1.8pt
+9.2%+7.4%
NULC vs SIZE Performance
+55.1%+43.0%
- NULC 0.21%
- SIZE 0.15%, better
- NULC $80M
- SIZE $433M
- NULC +13.9%
- SIZE +14.4%, better
- NULC 8.90%, better
- SIZE 1.36%
- NULC 129
- SIZE 518
- NULC 4.03K sh
- SIZE 5.21K sh, better
- NULC $54.93
- SIZE $180.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NULC | SIZE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72 | A81Higher |
| Mission | A98Higher | A93 |
| Risk | B63 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D26Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | C50 | A88Higher |
| Durability | D32 | B57Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. NULC and SIZE are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NULCB
SIZEA
In short
NULC An ESG screen on a growth-tilted US large-cap portfolio: roughly 140 names tracking the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Index at 0.21% a year, under the typical US factor fund's fee.
SIZE The size factor without leaving the large-cap pool: SIZE holds roughly 500 US stocks and leans toward the smaller names in that universe, spreading weight away from the mega-cap giants. An iShares factor original from 2013.
Stated mandate
NULC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Index.
SIZE The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks that have smaller market capitalizations relative to their peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NULC vs SIZE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NULC vs SIZE Cost
Overpaying NULC vs SIZE
$1,220
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NULC 0.21%
$4,357
SIZE 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NULC | SIZE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $274 | $109 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $1,071 | $420 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $3,137 | $1,220 |
- 0.21%NULC
- 0.15%SIZE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
SIZE 5th cheapest of 30 funds
NULC 9th cheapest of 30 funds
NULC vs SIZE Dividends
- NULC 8.90%, better
- SIZE 1.36%
- NULC $4.87
- SIZE $2.47
- NULC $4.87
- SIZE $0.65
- NULC Dec 18, 2025
- SIZE Sep 15, 2026
- NULC Dec 19, 2025
- SIZE Sep 18, 2026
- NULC Annual
- SIZE Quarterly
Distribution history
NULC vs SIZE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NULC
- SIZE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NULC 12.8%, betterSIZE 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- NULC 1.27, betterSIZE 1.06
- Worst fall
- NULC −27.9%SIZE −24.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- NULC 1.00SIZE 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.