MGV ranks 1st and POWA 20th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
MGV vs POWA
MGV −0.35pt a year
0.05%0.40%
MGV 64.5×the volume
247K3.82K
MGV +2.5pt
+13.3%+10.8%
MGV vs POWA Performance
+83.6%+41.5%
- MGV 0.05%, better
- POWA 0.40%
- MGV $13.6B
- POWA $168M
- MGV +25.6%, better
- POWA +3.0%
- MGV 1.82%, better
- POWA 0.91%
- MGV 117
- POWA 53
- MGV 247K sh, better
- POWA 3.82K sh
- MGV $168.92
- POWA $92.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MGV | POWA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D26 |
| Mission | B67Higher | B55 |
| Risk | A92Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | C49Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | B57 | B63Higher |
| Durability | A90Higher | C47 |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. MGV and POWA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MGVA
POWAC
In short
MGV Most "value" ETFs slide down into mid caps. MGV stays at the very top of the US market and buys the value half of it for five basis points. Vanguard's plain, cheap way to own the old-guard giants.
POWA Most factor funds slice on ratios. POWA screens for a business trait: companies that have held their profit margins steady, the fingerprint of pricing power. Roughly 50 US large- and mid-caps, held in equal slices.
Stated mandate
MGV The ETF seeks to track the Morningstar US Mega Cap Value Index and provides passive, diversified exposure to the largest value stocks in the U.S. market.
POWA The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index before fees and expenses. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies with historically consistent, stable profit margins.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MGV vs POWA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MGV vs POWA Cost
Overpaying POWA vs MGV
$7,030
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MGV 0.05%
$1,060
POWA 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MGV | POWA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $723 | $631 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,793 | $2,433 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $8,090 | $7,030 |
- 0.05%MGV, cheaper
- 0.40%POWA
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
MGV cheapest of 30 funds
POWA 22nd cheapest of 30 funds
MGV vs POWA Dividends
- MGV 1.82%, better
- POWA 0.91%
- MGV $3.07
- POWA $0.85
- MGV $0.72
- POWA $0.85
- MGV Sep 28, 2026
- POWA Dec 22, 2025
- MGV Sep 30, 2026
- POWA Dec 26, 2025
- MGV Quarterly
- POWA Annual
Distribution history
MGV vs POWA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MGV
- POWA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MGV 11.1%, betterPOWA 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- MGV 1.48, betterPOWA 0.81
- Worst fall
- MGV −16.5%, betterPOWA −17.8%
- Market sensitivity
- MGV 0.66POWA 0.77
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.