SIZE ranks 3rd and POWA 20th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
POWA vs SIZE
SIZE −0.25pt a year
0.40%0.15%
SIZE 1.4×the volume
3.82K5.21K
SIZE +1.2pt
+10.8%+12.0%
POWA vs SIZE Performance
+41.5%+43.6%
- POWA 0.40%
- SIZE 0.15%, better
- POWA $168M
- SIZE $433M
- POWA +3.0%
- SIZE +13.8%, better
- POWA 0.91%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- POWA 53
- SIZE 518
- POWA 3.82K sh
- SIZE 5.21K sh, better
- POWA $92.76
- SIZE $180.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | POWA | SIZE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A81Higher |
| Mission | B55 | A93Higher |
| Risk | C51 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D34Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | B63 | A88Higher |
| Durability | C47 | B57Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. POWA and SIZE are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
POWAC
SIZEA
In short
POWA Most factor funds slice on ratios. POWA screens for a business trait: companies that have held their profit margins steady, the fingerprint of pricing power. Roughly 50 US large- and mid-caps, held in equal slices.
SIZE The size factor without leaving the large-cap pool: SIZE holds roughly 500 US stocks and leans toward the smaller names in that universe, spreading weight away from the mega-cap giants. An iShares factor original from 2013.
Stated mandate
POWA The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index before fees and expenses. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies with historically consistent, stable profit margins.
SIZE The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks that have smaller market capitalizations relative to their peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
POWA vs SIZE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
POWA vs SIZE Cost
Overpaying POWA vs SIZE
$4,953
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
POWA 0.40%
$8,090
SIZE 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | POWA | SIZE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $274 | $449 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $1,071 | $1,722 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $3,137 | $4,953 |
- 0.40%POWA
- 0.15%SIZE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
SIZE 5th cheapest of 30 funds
POWA 22nd cheapest of 30 funds
POWA vs SIZE Dividends
- POWA 0.91%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- POWA $0.85
- SIZE $2.47
- POWA $0.85
- SIZE $0.65
- POWA Dec 22, 2025
- SIZE Sep 15, 2026
- POWA Dec 26, 2025
- SIZE Sep 18, 2026
- POWA Annual
- SIZE Quarterly
Distribution history
POWA vs SIZE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- POWA
- SIZE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- POWA 11.9%, betterSIZE 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- POWA 0.81SIZE 1.06, better
- Worst fall
- POWA −17.8%, betterSIZE −24.0%
- Market sensitivity
- POWA 0.77SIZE 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.