Skip to content

MJSC vs SCJ

MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF

MJSCCNYSE Arca

iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

SCJANYSE Arca

Overlap

15.6%by weight

Expense ratio

SCJ −0.51pt a year

MJSC1.01%SCJ0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

SCJ 19.1×the volume

MJSC2.02KSCJ38.6K

MJSC vs SCJ Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+15.4%MJSC+18.0%SCJ

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. MJSC +15.4%. SCJ +18.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%25%30%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
MJSC 1.01%
SCJ 0.50%, better
Fund size
MJSC $20M
SCJ $221M
1Y total return
MJSC +15.4%
SCJ +18.0%, better
Yield (12M)
MJSC No data
SCJ 2.79%
Holdings
MJSC 97
SCJ 767
Avg volume (30D)
MJSC 2.02K sh
SCJ 38.6K sh, better
NAV per share
MJSC $53.37
SCJ $100.33
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MJSC: Cost 9, Risk 34, Mission 97, Tradability 28, Holdings 75, Durability 22. SCJ: Cost 56, Risk 75, Mission 97, Tradability 77, Holdings 85, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for MJSC, SCJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMJSCSCJ
Cost30% weightF9B56Higher
Mission25% weightA97A97
Risk15% weightD34A75Higher
Tradability15% weightD28A77Higher
Holdings10% weightA75A85Higher
Durability5% weightF22B64Higher

Rank among Japan funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MJSC and SCJ are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Japan⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

SCJ ranks 3rd and MJSC 15th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLJPFranklin FTSE Japan ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2ABBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3ASCJiShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4AFLJHFranklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 14CJPANMatthews Japan Active ETF JPANScore 45
  6. Rank 15CMJSCMUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETFScore 44
  7. Rank 16CHEWJiShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MJSCCMUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF

SCJAiShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

In short

MJSC MUFG's first US-listed ETF: an active Tokyo stock-picking desk digging through Japanese small caps, roughly 100 names deep, in a category otherwise run by index trackers.

SCJ Japan past the household-name exporters. SCJ holds roughly 800 of the country's smaller listed companies, the domestic slice that large-cap Japan benchmarks leave out, and it has been running that mandate since 2007.

Stated mandate

MJSC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

SCJ The fund seeks to track an index composed of small-capitalization Japanese equities.

Why people hold it

  • MJSC Active where the category is mostly passive: a quantitative screen on market cap and credit risk, then growth, quality and value work, rather than cloning a small-cap index.mufgetfs.com
  • Japanese plumbing, not a Japan sleeve bolted onto a US shop. Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking sub-advises alongside Clearbrook, so the research sits near the companies.mufgetfs.cometfexpress.com
  • The portfolio matches what the prospectus promises: Japanese small-cap equities aimed at long-term capital appreciation, spread across about 100 names.
  • SCJ One job, done tightly: it tracks the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, roughly 800 names deep, the part of the market big blue-chip Japan benchmarks leave on the floor.ishares.com
  • Trading since 2007, so there is a long live record here, not a backtest, and it has stayed tight to its index over that stretch.
  • About 800 holdings means no single stock carries the portfolio, and the 0.50% fee sits right at the median for single-country Japan funds.

Worth knowing

  • MJSC Active Japan costs: 1.01% net of a waiver through December 31, 2027 (1.68% gross), above the category's typical fee. Index peers SCJ (0.50%) and FLJP (0.09%) charge far less.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, which can mean wider spreads and larger premiums or discounts than the category's big index names.
  • Launched in 2025, so there is little track record to judge, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than quarterly.
  • SCJ 0.50% a year is the going rate for the niche, but broad Japan trackers like FLJP (0.09%) and BBJP (0.19%) charge a fraction. Small-cap coverage is the upcharge.
  • Moderately traded, and Tokyo is closed while US markets are open, so spreads and price-to-value gaps can widen at the edges of the session.
  • Unhedged: the holdings are priced in yen, so currency swings land on top of the stock moves, in both directions. Distributions come once or twice a year.ishares.com

Full MJSC profile⁠

Full SCJ profile⁠

MJSC vs SCJ Holdings

How MJSC and SCJ differ

Overlap by weight

15.6%

Shared holdings make up 94.5% of MJSC and 15.8% of SCJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings91 in both15.6%
  • Sector11 Sectors83.1%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in MJSC and SCJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in MJSCMore in SCJGap
TechnologyMJSC +9.2 points
Real EstateSCJ +5.3 points
IndustrialsMJSC +4.8 points
Consumer StaplesSCJ +4.5 points
CommunicationMJSC +2.9 points
Consumer DiscretionarySCJ +2.9 points
UtilitiesSCJ +1.5 points
MaterialsSCJ +1.5 points
FinancialsSCJ +0.6 points
Health CareSCJ +0.5 points
EnergySCJ +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MJSC and SCJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in MJSCMore in SCJGap
JapanSame weight

Outside the US: MJSC 100% developed, 0% emerging. SCJ 100% developed, 0% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MJSC19.0%
  • SCJ6.3%

Securities held

  • MJSC96
  • SCJ764

Asset class

MJSC
Stocks
SCJ
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in MJSC5
  • In both91
  • Only in SCJ673

Only in MJSC

5 securities, 4.5% of MJSC by weight

  • Cti Engineering Co Ltd1.28%
  • Gmo Financial Gate Inc1.22%
  • Celsys Inc1.08%

Only in SCJ

673 securities, 83.1% of SCJ by weight

  • Baycurrent Inc0.82%
  • Mebuki Financial Group Inc0.58%
  • Niterra0.56%

Weight gaps

All 91 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in MJSC and SCJ, widest gap first
HoldingMore in MJSCMore in SCJGap
Saizeriya Co LtdMJSC +2.27 points
Hachijuni Nagano Bank LtdMJSC +1.74 points
Nsd Co LtdMJSC +1.73 points
Obic Business ConsultantsMJSC +1.69 points
Infroneer Holdings IncMJSC +1.59 points
Nagase & Co LtdMJSC +1.58 points
Morinaga Milk Industry Co LtdMJSC +1.57 points
Tokyo Tatemono Co LtdMJSC +1.56 points

All 96 MJSC holdings⁠All 764 SCJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MJSC vs SCJ Cost

Overpaying MJSC vs SCJ

$8,871

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MJSC 1.01%

    $18,850

  • SCJ 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MJSC 1.01%
  • SCJ 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MJSC $18,850SCJ $9,979

Year by year

YearMJSCSCJOverpaying
10$1,780$900$880
20$6,686$3,460$3,226
30$18,850$9,979$8,871

Expense ratio

  • 1.01%MJSC
  • 0.50%SCJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Japan funds
  • Median 0.54%

SCJ 9th cheapest of 18 funds

MJSC 16th cheapest of 18 funds

MJSC vs SCJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
MJSC No data
SCJ 2.79%
Payout (12M)
MJSC No data
SCJ $2.92
Last payment
MJSC $0.33
SCJ $0.92
Ex-dividend
MJSC Dec 30, 2025
SCJ Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
MJSC Dec 31, 2025
SCJ Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
MJSC Irregular
SCJ Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

MJSCIrregular · 1 paymentAll MJSC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.33. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
SCJTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll SCJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.61; Dec 19, 2017 $0.55; Jun 19, 2018 $0.41; Dec 18, 2018 $0.53; Jun 17, 2019 $1.19; Dec 16, 2019 $2.12; Jun 15, 2020 $0.70; Jun 10, 2021 $0.59; Dec 13, 2021 $0.82; Jun 9, 2022 $0.76; Jun 7, 2023 $0.50; Dec 20, 2023 $0.93; Jun 11, 2024 $0.71; Dec 17, 2024 $0.60; Jun 16, 2025 $0.89; Dec 16, 2025 $2.00; Jun 15, 2026 $0.92. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

MJSC vs SCJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MJSC 22.4%since Oct 2025SCJ 13.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MJSC 0.61since Oct 2025SCJ 1.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MJSC −14.5%since Sep 2025SCJ −27.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MJSC 1.01SCJ 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • MJSCCvsFLJPA

    MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCJAvsFLJPA

    iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MJSCCvsBBJPA

    MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCJAvsBBJPA

    iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MJSCCvsFLJHA

    MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCJAvsFLJHA

    iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.