Skip to content

FLJP vs MJSC

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

FLJPANYSE Arca

MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF

MJSCCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLJP −0.92pt a year

FLJP0.09%MJSC1.01%

Avg volume · 30D

FLJP 481.8×the volume

FLJP973KMJSC2.02K

FLJP vs MJSC Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+14.9%FLJP+15.4%MJSC

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. FLJP +14.9%. MJSC +15.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%20%25%30%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FLJP 0.09%, better
MJSC 1.01%
Fund size
FLJP $3.97B
MJSC $20M
1Y total return
FLJP +14.9%
MJSC +15.4%, better
Yield (12M)
FLJP 4.32%
MJSC No data
Holdings
FLJP 447
MJSC 97
Avg volume (30D)
FLJP 973K sh, better
MJSC 2.02K sh
NAV per share
FLJP $37.13
MJSC $53.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLJP: Cost 97, Risk 47, Mission 100, Tradability 77, Holdings 73, Durability 61. MJSC: Cost 9, Risk 34, Mission 97, Tradability 28, Holdings 75, Durability 22.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLJP, MJSC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLJPMJSC
Cost30% weightA97HigherF9
Mission25% weightA100HigherA97
Risk15% weightC47HigherD34
Tradability15% weightA77HigherD28
Holdings10% weightA73A75Higher
Durability5% weightB61HigherF22

Rank among Japan funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLJP and MJSC are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Japan⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

FLJP ranks 1st and MJSC 15th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLJPFranklin FTSE Japan ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2ABBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 14CJPANMatthews Japan Active ETF JPANScore 45
  4. Rank 15CMJSCMUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 16CHEWJiShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLJPAFranklin FTSE Japan ETF

MJSCCMUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF

In short

FLJP Japan's whole market for nine basis points. FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index across roughly 500 stocks at 0.09%, a fraction of what the typical Japan fund charges.

MJSC MUFG's first US-listed ETF: an active Tokyo stock-picking desk digging through Japanese small caps, roughly 100 names deep, in a category otherwise run by index trackers.

Stated mandate

FLJP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.

MJSC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • FLJP 0.09% a year, against a Japan-cohort median near 0.50%. Same country, same broad exposure, a fraction of the toll.
  • Roughly 500 names via the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, whose capping rules trim outsized positions so no single stock runs away with the portfolio.
  • Running since 2017 and now a multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, it tracks its index tightly and ranks among the strongest builds in its Japan peer group.
  • Cheaper than the bigger brand-name Japan trackers it competes with, including EWJ at 0.49% and BBJP at 0.19%.
  • MJSC Active where the category is mostly passive: a quantitative screen on market cap and credit risk, then growth, quality and value work, rather than cloning a small-cap index.mufgetfs.com
  • Japanese plumbing, not a Japan sleeve bolted onto a US shop. Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking sub-advises alongside Clearbrook, so the research sits near the companies.mufgetfs.cometfexpress.com
  • The portfolio matches what the prospectus promises: Japanese small-cap equities aimed at long-term capital appreciation, spread across about 100 names.

Worth knowing

  • FLJP The yen rides along. Currency moves hit returns here; Franklin's hedged twin, FLJH, strips that out for the same 0.09%.
  • One country, one market cycle. Everything inside depends on Japan, so this is a slice of a portfolio rather than a diversified core.
  • Distributions land annually or semiannually, not monthly, so cash flow arrives in lumps.
  • MJSC Active Japan costs: 1.01% net of a waiver through December 31, 2027 (1.68% gross), above the category's typical fee. Index peers SCJ (0.50%) and FLJP (0.09%) charge far less.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, which can mean wider spreads and larger premiums or discounts than the category's big index names.
  • Launched in 2025, so there is little track record to judge, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than quarterly.

Full FLJP profile⁠

Full MJSC profile⁠

FLJP vs MJSC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLJP vs MJSC Cost

Overpaying MJSC vs FLJP

$16,952

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLJP 0.09%

    $1,898

  • MJSC 1.01%

    $18,850

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLJP 0.09%
  • MJSC 1.01%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MJSC $18,850FLJP $1,898

Year by year

YearFLJPMJSCOverpaying
10$165$1,780$1,615
20$646$6,686$6,040
30$1,898$18,850$16,952

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%FLJP, cheaper
  • 1.01%MJSC
  • Middle half of Japan funds
  • Median 0.54%

FLJP cheapest of 18 funds

MJSC 16th cheapest of 18 funds

FLJP vs MJSC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLJP 4.32%
MJSC No data
Payout (12M)
FLJP $1.69
MJSC No data
Last payment
FLJP $0.17
MJSC $0.33
Ex-dividend
FLJP Jun 26, 2026
MJSC Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
FLJP Jul 6, 2026
MJSC Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
FLJP Twice a year
MJSC Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLJPTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLJP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.03; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.24; Jun 11, 2019 $0.29; Dec 11, 2019 $0.30; Jun 11, 2020 $0.21; Dec 30, 2020 $0.24; Jun 10, 2021 $0.39; Dec 13, 2021 $0.31; Jun 17, 2022 $0.26; Dec 16, 2022 $0.21; Jun 16, 2023 $0.36; Dec 15, 2023 $0.48; Jun 21, 2024 $1.03; Dec 20, 2024 $0.28; Jun 20, 2025 $0.25; Dec 19, 2025 $1.52; Jun 26, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
MJSCIrregular · 1 paymentAll MJSC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.33. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FLJP vs MJSC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLJP 12.5%MJSC 22.4%since Oct 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLJP 1.17MJSC 0.61since Oct 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLJP −28.4%MJSC −14.5%since Sep 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLJP 0.98MJSC 1.01

FLJP and MJSC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FLJPAvsEWJA

    Franklin FTSE Japan ETF · iShares MSCI Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MJSCCvsBBJPA

    MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLJPAvsBBJPA

    Franklin FTSE Japan ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MJSCCvsSCJA

    MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF · iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLJPAvsSCJA

    Franklin FTSE Japan ETF · iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MJSCCvsFLJHA

    MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.