MMIT ranks 4th and TAFM 6th of 19 funds in the Intermediate Municipal Bonds Category.
MMIT vs TAFM
TAFM −0.02pt a year
0.30%0.28%
MMIT 1.4×the volume
689K477K
MMIT vs TAFM Performance
+0.7%+0.3%
- MMIT 0.30%
- TAFM 0.28%, better
- MMIT $1.45B
- TAFM $1.14B
- MMIT +0.7%, better
- TAFM +0.3%
- MMIT 4.02%, better
- TAFM 3.73%
- MMIT 963
- TAFM 807
- MMIT 689K sh, better
- TAFM 477K sh
- MMIT $23.64
- TAFM $24.71
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MMIT | TAFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | B68Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A97 |
| Risk | C52Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A79Higher | B60 |
| Durability | B66 | B69Higher |
Rank among Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. MMIT and TAFM are both graded against the same 19 Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MMITA
TAFMA
In short
MMIT Active muni bond-picking in an ETF wrapper. MacKay Shields' municipal desk has run MMIT since 2017, sifting roughly 900 investment-grade, AMT-free bonds for income exempt from federal tax, and paying it out monthly.
TAFM Active muni management in an ETF wrapper: AB steers roughly 600 intermediate-term municipal bonds toward after-tax income instead of hugging a benchmark, and charges a shade under the typical muni fund.
Stated mandate
MMIT The Fund seeks current income exempt from federal income tax.
TAFM The actively managed ETF seeks enhanced income and attractive risk-adjusted after-tax returns. It invests in an intermediate-duration municipal bond portfolio.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MMIT vs TAFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MMIT vs TAFM Cost
Overpaying MMIT vs TAFM
$394
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MMIT 0.30%
$6,149
TAFM 0.28%
$5,755
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MMIT | TAFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $509 | $36 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $1,976 | $137 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $5,755 | $394 |
- 0.30%MMIT
- 0.28%TAFM, cheaper
- Middle half of Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.30%
TAFM 7th cheapest of 19 funds
MMIT 8th cheapest of 19 funds
MMIT vs TAFM Dividends
- MMIT 4.02%, better
- TAFM 3.73%
- MMIT $0.95
- TAFM $0.92
- MMIT $0.07
- TAFM $0.07
- MMIT Oct 30, 2026
- TAFM Oct 1, 2026
- MMIT Pays Nov 3, 2026
- TAFM Oct 6, 2026
- MMIT Monthly
- TAFM Monthly
Distribution history
MMIT vs TAFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MMIT 5.0%TAFM 5.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- MMIT −0.01TAFM −0.38
- Worst fall
- MMIT −12.1%TAFM −6.6%
- Market sensitivity
- MMIT 0.73TAFM 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.