USCA ranks 2nd and MMTM 9th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
MMTM vs USCA
USCA −0.05pt a year
0.12%0.07%
USCA 38.0×the volume
2.58K97.9K
USCA +1.4pt
+19.9%+21.3%
MMTM vs USCA Performance
+1.1%+6.8%
- MMTM 0.12%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- MMTM $130M
- USCA $3.42B
- MMTM +1.1%
- USCA +6.8%, better
- MMTM 0.93%
- USCA 1.06%, better
- MMTM 1490
- USCA 392
- MMTM 2.58K sh
- USCA 97.9K sh, better
- MMTM $302.79
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MMTM | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A84 | A91Higher |
| Risk | D33 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | C43Higher | D29 |
| Durability | C50Higher | C49 |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. MMTM and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MMTMB
USCAA
In short
MMTM Most momentum funds cut the market down to a hundred-odd winners. MMTM keeps roughly 1,500 US large, mid and small caps and just reweights them: strong momentum overweight, laggards underweight, for 0.12% a year.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
MMTM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. The index emphasizes stocks with stronger recent price momentum.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MMTM vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MMTM vs USCA Cost
Overpaying MMTM vs USCA
$1,040
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MMTM 0.12%
$2,520
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MMTM | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $128 | $92 |
| 20 | $859 | $503 | $356 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $1,480 | $1,040 |
- 0.12%MMTM
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
MMTM 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
MMTM vs USCA Dividends
- MMTM 0.93%
- USCA 1.06%, better
- MMTM $2.74
- USCA $0.47
- MMTM $0.66
- USCA $0.10
- MMTM Sep 21, 2026
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- MMTM Sep 23, 2026
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- MMTM Quarterly
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
MMTM vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MMTM 14.5%USCA 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MMTM 1.03USCA 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- MMTM −23.7%USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- MMTM 1.03USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.