SIZE ranks 3rd and MMTM 9th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
MMTM vs SIZE
MMTM −0.03pt a year
0.12%0.15%
SIZE 2.0×the volume
2.58K5.21K
MMTM +2.2pt
+14.2%+12.0%
MMTM vs SIZE Performance
+57.9%+43.6%
- MMTM 0.12%, better
- SIZE 0.15%
- MMTM $130M
- SIZE $433M
- MMTM +1.1%
- SIZE +13.8%, better
- MMTM 0.93%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- MMTM 1490
- SIZE 518
- MMTM 2.58K sh
- SIZE 5.21K sh, better
- MMTM $302.79
- SIZE $180.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MMTM | SIZE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | A81 |
| Mission | A84 | A93Higher |
| Risk | D33 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D29Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | C43 | A88Higher |
| Durability | C50 | B57Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. MMTM and SIZE are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MMTMB
SIZEA
In short
MMTM Most momentum funds cut the market down to a hundred-odd winners. MMTM keeps roughly 1,500 US large, mid and small caps and just reweights them: strong momentum overweight, laggards underweight, for 0.12% a year.
SIZE The size factor without leaving the large-cap pool: SIZE holds roughly 500 US stocks and leans toward the smaller names in that universe, spreading weight away from the mega-cap giants. An iShares factor original from 2013.
Stated mandate
MMTM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. The index emphasizes stocks with stronger recent price momentum.
SIZE The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks that have smaller market capitalizations relative to their peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MMTM vs SIZE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MMTM vs SIZE Cost
Overpaying SIZE vs MMTM
$617
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MMTM 0.12%
$2,520
SIZE 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MMTM | SIZE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $274 | $54 |
| 20 | $859 | $1,071 | $212 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $3,137 | $617 |
- 0.12%MMTM, cheaper
- 0.15%SIZE
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
MMTM 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
SIZE 5th cheapest of 30 funds
MMTM vs SIZE Dividends
- MMTM 0.93%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- MMTM $2.74
- SIZE $2.47
- MMTM $0.66
- SIZE $0.65
- MMTM Sep 21, 2026
- SIZE Sep 15, 2026
- MMTM Sep 23, 2026
- SIZE Sep 18, 2026
- MMTM Quarterly
- SIZE Quarterly
Distribution history
MMTM vs SIZE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MMTM
- SIZE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MMTM 14.5%SIZE 13.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MMTM 1.03SIZE 1.06, better
- Worst fall
- MMTM −23.7%, betterSIZE −24.0%
- Market sensitivity
- MMTM 1.03SIZE 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.