MNA ranks 2nd and NTRL 4th of 4 funds in the Merger Arbitrage Category.
MNA vs NTRL
MNA −0.17pt a year
0.78%0.95%
MNA 3.2×the volume
37.7K11.9K
NTRL +1.5pt
+2.6%+4.1%
MNA vs NTRL Performance
+13.5%+22.5%
- MNA 0.78%, better
- NTRL 0.95%
- MNA $265M
- NTRL $16M
- MNA +3.0%
- NTRL +9.2%, better
- MNA 0.00%
- NTRL 6.17%, better
- MNA 53
- NTRL 190
- MNA 37.7K sh, better
- NTRL 11.9K sh
- MNA $36.94
- NTRL $20.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MNA | NTRL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66Higher | D33 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | C49Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | C52Higher | C49 |
| Durability | A76Higher | C47 |
Rank among Merger Arbitrage funds
Same Category. MNA and NTRL are both graded against the same 4 Merger Arbitrage funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MNAB
NTRLC
In short
NTRL NTRL launched in 2020 chasing merger-arbitrage spreads on announced takeovers. Per First Trust, it converts on June 24, 2026 to a plain U.S. equity mandate built with stocks, ETFs and derivatives. Same ticker, different engine.
Stated mandate
NTRL After converting from the First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF on June 24, 2026, NTRL seeks capital appreciation through at least 80% exposure to U.S.-listed equity securities, implemented through derivatives, ETFs, and/or stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MNA vs NTRL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MNA vs NTRL Cost
Overpaying NTRL vs MNA
$2,867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MNA 0.78%
$15,002
NTRL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MNA | NTRL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,678 | $290 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $6,322 | $1,054 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $17,869 | $2,867 |
- 0.78%MNA, cheaper
- 0.95%NTRL
MNA vs NTRL Dividends
- MNA 0.00%
- NTRL 6.17%, better
- MNA None
- NTRL $1.29
- MNA
- NTRL $1.16
- MNA
- NTRL Sep 24, 2026
- MNA
- NTRL Sep 30, 2026
- MNA
- NTRL Twice a year
Distribution history
MNA vs NTRL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MNA
- NTRL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MNA 2.8%, betterNTRL 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MNA 0.45, betterNTRL 0.22
- Worst fall
- MNA −8.4%NTRL −3.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- MNA 0.01NTRL 0.04
MNA and NTRL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.82%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.82%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

