USCL ranks 7th and MNZL 43rd of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
MNZL vs USCL
USCL −0.32pt a year
0.40%0.08%
USCL 2.0×the volume
6.45K13.1K
MNZL vs USCL Performance
+16.9%+7.9%
- MNZL 0.40%
- USCL 0.08%, better
- MNZL $39M
- USCL $2.61B
- MNZL
- USCL +9.6%
- MNZL
- USCL 1.06%
- MNZL 483
- USCL 393
- MNZL 6.45K sh
- USCL 13.1K sh, better
- MNZL $60.27
- USCL $83.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MNZL | USCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | C47 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | D34Higher |
| Durability | F2 | A71Higher |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. MNZL and USCL are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MNZLC
USCLA
In short
MNZL A broad slice of the US market, filtered for faith. MNZL passively tracks a Russell index that screens stocks for Shariah compliance, then adds a second AFSC layer. Ordinary index plumbing, faith-based rules on top. Launched 2025.
USCL Most ESG index funds work by exclusion. USCL scores roughly 400 US large and mid caps on where they're heading instead: emissions intensity, reduction targets, green revenue. And it charges 0.08% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
MNZL The Fund uses passive indexing to track the total return performance of its Russell index before fees and expenses. The index consists of common stocks and applies Shariah screening followed by AFSC principles.
USCL The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for their relative positioning on the transition to a low-carbon economy, using climate-related measures such as emissions intensity, reduction targets, green-business revenue, and climate-risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MNZL vs USCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MNZL vs USCL Cost
Overpaying MNZL vs USCL
$6,401
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MNZL 0.40%
$8,090
USCL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MNZL | USCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $147 | $576 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $575 | $2,218 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,689 | $6,401 |
- 0.40%MNZL
- 0.08%USCL, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
USCL cheapest of 47 funds
MNZL 35th cheapest of 47 funds
MNZL vs USCL Dividends
- MNZL
- USCL 1.06%
- MNZL
- USCL $0.91
- MNZL $0.02
- USCL $0.20
- MNZL Dec 30, 2025
- USCL Sep 15, 2026
- MNZL Dec 31, 2025
- USCL Sep 18, 2026
- MNZL Irregular
- USCL Quarterly
Distribution history
MNZL vs USCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MNZL USCL 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- MNZL USCL 1.28
- Worst fall
- MNZL USCL −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- MNZL 1.08USCL 1.01
MNZL and USCL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
