Skip to content

MSOL vs SOLC

Morgan Stanley Solana Trust

MSOLANYSE Arca

Canary Marinade Solana ETF

SOLCCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

MSOL −0.36pt a year

MSOL0.14%SOLC0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

MSOL 6.5×the volume

MSOL42.1KSOLC6.51K

MSOL vs SOLC Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

+18.3%MSOL+18.6%SOLC

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. MSOL +18.3%. SOLC +18.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%60%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
MSOL 0.14%, better
SOLC 0.50%
Fund size
MSOL $41M
SOLC $3M
Holdings
MSOL 1
SOLC 1
Avg volume (30D)
MSOL 42.1K sh, better
SOLC 6.51K sh
NAV per share
MSOL $24.41
SOLC $18.28
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MSOL: Cost 94, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings 56, Durability 47. SOLC: Cost 21, Risk 54, Mission 100, Tradability 27, Holdings not scored, Durability 22.
Pillar letters and Scores for MSOL, SOLC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMSOLSOLC
Cost30% weightA94HigherF21
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightA93HigherC54
Tradability15% weightB62HigherD27
Holdings10% weightB56Not scored
Durability5% weightC47HigherF22

Rank among Spot Solana funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MSOL and SOLC are both graded against the same 9 Spot Solana funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Spot Solana⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

MSOL ranks 1st and SOLC 9th of 9 funds in the Spot Solana Category.

  1. Rank 1AMSOLMorgan Stanley Solana TrustScore 82
  2. Rank 2AGSOLGrayscale Solana Staking ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 8CSSKREX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETFScore 42
  4. Rank 9CSOLCCanary Marinade Solana ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MSOLAMorgan Stanley Solana Trust

SOLCCCanary Marinade Solana ETF

In short

MSOL No data

SOLC Spot Solana that also stakes, launched into the crowded late-2025 Solana rush. The staking machinery is real; so is the 0.50% fee, more than double what the typical fund in this cohort charges.

Stated mandate

MSOL No data

SOLC The Trust seeks exposure to the price of Solana held by it, after operating expenses and liabilities. It also seeks additional SOL through Solana Network proof-of-stake validation.

Why people hold it

MSOL No data

  • SOLC Holds SOL directly and puts it to work: the trust seeks additional SOL through Solana proof-of-stake validation, not just price exposure.
  • Staking rewards are pursued as more SOL inside the trust rather than cash payouts, and the fund has not made distributions.
  • One brokerage ticker covers both holding and staking Solana, with the trust handling custody and validation mechanics.

Worth knowing

MSOL No data

  • SOLC The 0.50% fee sits well above the cohort median of 0.21%, and staking rivals BSOL (0.20%) and GSOL (0.19%) do a similar job for less.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, so spreads tend to be wider than at the largest Solana ETFs.
  • Launched in November 2025 into a six-fund Solana field, so the track record is short and it starts from the back of that group.

Full MSOL profile⁠

Full SOLC profile⁠

MSOL vs SOLC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MSOL vs SOLC Cost

Overpaying SOLC vs MSOL

$7,047

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MSOL 0.14%

    $2,932

  • SOLC 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MSOL 0.14%
  • SOLC 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530SOLC $9,979MSOL $2,932

Year by year

YearMSOLSOLCOverpaying
10$256$900$644
20$1,000$3,460$2,460
30$2,932$9,979$7,047

Expense ratio

  • 0.14%MSOL, cheaper
  • 0.50%SOLC
  • Middle half of Spot Solana funds
  • Median 0.21%

MSOL cheapest of 9 funds

SOLC 8th cheapest of 9 funds

MSOL vs SOLC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
MSOL No data
SOLC None
Last payment
MSOL $0.06
SOLC No data
Ex-dividend
MSOL Nov 4, 2026
SOLC No data
Paid on
MSOL Nov 5, 2026
SOLC No data
Frequency
MSOL Irregular
SOLC No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

MSOLIrregular · 5 paymentsAll MSOL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 3, 2026 $0.06; Sep 17, 2026 $0.04; Oct 5, 2026 $0.07; Oct 19, 2026 $0.05; Nov 4, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD
SOLCAll SOLC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MSOL vs SOLC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MSOL 0.00SOLC 0.58

Popular comparisons

  • MSOLAvsBSOLA

    Morgan Stanley Solana Trust · Bitwise Solana Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOLCCvsGSOLA

    Canary Marinade Solana ETF · Grayscale Solana Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MSOLAvsGSOLA

    Morgan Stanley Solana Trust · Grayscale Solana Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOLCCvsSOEZA

    Canary Marinade Solana ETF · Franklin Solana ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MSOLAvsSOEZA

    Morgan Stanley Solana Trust · Franklin Solana ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOLCCvsBSOLA

    Canary Marinade Solana ETF · Bitwise Solana Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.