MUB ranks 2nd and NYF 6th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MUB vs NYF
MUB −0.04pt a year
0.05%0.09%
MUB 22.9×the volume
9.29M405K
MUB +0.1pt
+1.8%+1.7%
MUB vs NYF Performance
+3.2%+3.0%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- NYF 0.09%
- MUB $54.4B
- NYF $1.76B
- MUB +0.1%
- NYF +0.1%
- MUB 3.28%, better
- NYF 3.21%
- MUB 7950
- NYF 1039
- MUB 9.29M sh, better
- NYF 405K sh
- MUB $103.96
- NYF $52.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUB | NYF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | A90 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B65Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | B67 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A87 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MUB and NYF are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUBA
NYFA
In short
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
NYF New York in one ticker: roughly 900 investment-grade, AMT-free munis from the Empire State, at a fee that undercuts most muni funds. Running since 2007, and it tracks its index closely.
Stated mandate
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
NYF The fund seeks to track the ICE AMT-Free New York Plus Municipal Index, which represents investment-grade, tax-exempt U.S. dollar debt issued primarily by New York and its political subdivisions. It uses indexing and representative sampling rather than active security selection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUB vs NYF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUB vs NYF Cost
Overpaying NYF vs MUB
$838
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
NYF 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUB | NYF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $165 | $73 |
| 20 | $360 | $646 | $286 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $1,898 | $838 |
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- 0.09%NYF
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
NYF 7th cheapest of 63 funds
MUB vs NYF Dividends
- MUB 3.28%, better
- NYF 3.21%
- MUB $3.42
- NYF $1.68
- MUB $0.28
- NYF $0.14
- MUB Oct 1, 2026
- NYF Oct 1, 2026
- MUB Oct 6, 2026
- NYF Oct 6, 2026
- MUB Monthly
- NYF Monthly
Distribution history
MUB vs NYF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MUB
- NYF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUB 5.7%, betterNYF 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUB −0.03NYF −0.02, better
- Worst fall
- MUB −11.6%, betterNYF −12.3%
- Market sensitivity
- MUB 0.90NYF 0.96
MUB and NYF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




