MUB ranks 3rd and RJMI 51st of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MUB vs RJMI
MUB −0.36pt a year
0.05%0.41%
MUB 643.1×the volume
9.65M15K
MUB vs RJMI Performance
+1.1%+1.2%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- RJMI 0.41%
- MUB $55B
- RJMI $46M
- MUB +1.1%
- RJMI +1.2%, better
- MUB 3.26%
- RJMI 3.28%, better
- MUB 7990
- RJMI 129
- MUB 9.65M sh, better
- RJMI 15K sh
- MUB $104.86
- RJMI $24.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUB | RJMI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A98 |
| Risk | B56Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | B64 |
| Durability | A93Higher | F12 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MUB and RJMI are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUBA
RJMIC
In short
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
RJMI A 2025 debut from Raymond James: a national muni bond ETF built bond by bond, aimed at income exempt from federal tax. The trade-off is price, in a corner of the market where the index giants charge three basis points.
Stated mandate
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
RJMI The fund seeks to invest at least 80% of its assets in a diversified portfolio of debt securities whose interest is exempt from federal income tax, as determined by issuer bond counsel.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUB vs RJMI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUB vs RJMI Cost
Overpaying RJMI vs MUB
$7,221
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
RJMI 0.41%
$8,281
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUB | RJMI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $741 | $649 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,860 | $2,500 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $8,281 | $7,221 |
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- 0.41%RJMI
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
RJMI 52nd cheapest of 63 funds
MUB vs RJMI Dividends
- MUB 3.26%
- RJMI 3.28%, better
- MUB $3.42
- RJMI $0.82
- MUB $0.28
- RJMI $0.07
- MUB Nov 2, 2026
- RJMI Oct 30, 2026
- MUB Nov 5, 2026
- RJMI Nov 2, 2026
- MUB Monthly
- RJMI Monthly
Distribution history
MUB vs RJMI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUB 5.7%RJMI 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUB −0.03RJMI −0.52
- Worst fall
- MUB −11.6%RJMI −7.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MUB 0.90RJMI 0.15
MUB and RJMI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





