SCMB ranks 2nd and VCRM 4th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
SCMB vs VCRM
SCMB −0.09pt a year
0.03%0.12%
SCMB 4.8×the volume
3.28M679K
SCMB vs VCRM Performance
−0.6%+1.1%
- SCMB 0.03%, better
- VCRM 0.12%
- SCMB $4.07B
- VCRM $2.2B
- SCMB −0.6%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- SCMB 3.70%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- SCMB 8203
- VCRM 2588
- SCMB 3.28M sh, better
- VCRM 679K sh
- SCMB $24.87
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCMB | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A89 |
| Mission | A96 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B57 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | A80 |
| Holdings | A81 | A81 |
| Durability | A72 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. SCMB and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCMBA
VCRMA
In short
SCMB Schwab's take on the core muni sleeve: three basis points, thousands of AMT-free bonds from across the country, and a monthly distribution. Bottom-of-the-table pricing, no frills attached.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
SCMB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the U.S. AMT-free municipal bond market.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCMB vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCMB vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying VCRM vs SCMB
$1,882
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCMB 0.03%
$638
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCMB | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $220 | $165 |
| 20 | $216 | $859 | $643 |
| 30 | $638 | $2,520 | $1,882 |
- 0.03%SCMB, cheaper
- 0.12%VCRM
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
SCMB cheapest of 63 funds
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
SCMB vs VCRM Dividends
- SCMB 3.70%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- SCMB $0.92
- VCRM $2.82
- SCMB $0.09
- VCRM $0.21
- SCMB Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- SCMB Oct 7, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- SCMB Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
SCMB vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCMB 5.9%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCMB −0.04VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- SCMB −6.7%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- SCMB 0.96VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.