PANG ranks 3rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MUG vs PANG
PANG −0.23pt a year
0.99%0.76%
PANG 1.2×the volume
38.2K44.6K
MUG vs PANG Performance
−35.0%−18.8%
- MUG 0.99%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- MUG $3M
- PANG $9M
- MUG
- PANG +91.6%
- MUG 4
- PANG 4
- MUG 38.2K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- MUG $12.18
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
- —MUGNot yet graded
| Pillar | MUG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A74 | |
| Tradability | A74 | |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Our read on each fund
MUG—
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying MUG vs PANG
$3,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUG 0.99%
$18,525
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,353 | $393 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $5,142 | $1,423 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $14,656 | $3,869 |
- 0.99%MUG
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
MUG 169th cheapest of 315 funds
MUG vs PANG Dividends
- MUG None
- PANG
- MUG
- PANG $1.30
- MUG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- MUG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- MUG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
MUG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUG PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUG PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- MUG PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- MUG 0.00PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.