OKTG ranks 3rd and MUU 46th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MUU vs OKTG
OKTG −0.26pt a year
1.01%0.75%
MUU 879.1×the volume
33.2M37.8K
MUU vs OKTG Performance
+211.1%+144.2%
- MUU 1.01%
- OKTG 0.75%, better
- MUU $1.55B
- OKTG $5M
- MUU +311.7%
- OKTG
- MUU 3.48%
- OKTG
- MUU 11
- OKTG 6
- MUU 33.2M sh, better
- OKTG 37.8K sh
- MUU $13.77
- OKTG $34.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUU | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A90 | A95Higher |
| Risk | B66 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A86Higher | C50 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MUU and OKTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUUB
OKTGA
In short
MUU Two ETFs offer 2x daily Micron. MUU is the cheaper one, and the one that actually trades. The mandate is 200% of Micron's daily share move before fees, with the leverage clock reset every morning.
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
MUU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Micron Technology, Inc.’s common shares.
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUU vs OKTG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUU vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying MUU vs OKTG
$4,368
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUU 1.01%
$18,850
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUU | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $1,336 | $444 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $5,078 | $1,608 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $14,482 | $4,368 |
- 1.01%MUU
- 0.75%OKTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
OKTG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
MUU 198th cheapest of 312 funds
MUU vs OKTG Dividends
- MUU 3.48%
- OKTG
- MUU $0.54
- OKTG None
- MUU $0.20
- OKTG
- MUU Sep 22, 2026
- OKTG
- MUU Sep 29, 2026
- OKTG
- MUU Quarterly
- OKTG
Distribution history
MUU vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUU 216.8%OKTG
- Return per unit of risk
- MUU 1.44OKTG
- Worst fall
- MUU −79.4%OKTG
- Market sensitivity
- MUU 7.80OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.