TSMG ranks 2nd and MUU 46th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MUU vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.25pt a year
1.01%0.76%
MUU 488.2×the volume
33.2M68.1K
MUU vs TSMG Performance
+311.7%+40.3%
- MUU 1.01%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- MUU $1.55B
- TSMG $24M
- MUU +311.7%, better
- TSMG +40.3%
- MUU 3.48%
- TSMG
- MUU 11
- TSMG 6
- MUU 33.2M sh, better
- TSMG 68.1K sh
- MUU $13.77
- TSMG $28.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUU | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A90Higher | A75 |
| Risk | B66 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | A70 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A86Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MUU and TSMG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUUB
TSMGA
In short
MUU Two ETFs offer 2x daily Micron. MUU is the cheaper one, and the one that actually trades. The mandate is 200% of Micron's daily share move before fees, with the leverage clock reset every morning.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
MUU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Micron Technology, Inc.’s common shares.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUU vs TSMG Holdings
How MUU and TSMG differ
0.0%
About this figure: MUU gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
TSMG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in MUUMore in TSMG | Gap | MUU | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- MUU98.8%
- TSMG211.0%
- MUU2
- TSMG2
Asset class
- MUU
- Stocks
- TSMG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in MUU2
- In both0
- Only in TSMG2
Only in MUU
2 securities, 20.9% of MUU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50614.44%
- Micron Technology Inc6.46%
Only in TSMG
2 securities, 21.0% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204010.98%
- 874039100 Swp10.06%
Weight gaps
MUU and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUU vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying MUU vs TSMG
$4,194
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUU 1.01%
$18,850
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUU | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $1,353 | $427 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $5,142 | $1,544 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $14,656 | $4,194 |
- 1.01%MUU
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 312 funds
MUU 198th cheapest of 312 funds
MUU vs TSMG Dividends
- MUU 3.48%
- TSMG
- MUU $0.54
- TSMG
- MUU $0.20
- TSMG $2.73
- MUU Sep 22, 2026
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- MUU Sep 29, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- MUU Quarterly
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
MUU vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUU 216.8%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUU 1.44TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- MUU −79.4%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MUU 7.80TSMG 3.98
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.