UNHG ranks 2nd and MVLL 118th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MVLL vs UNHG
0.0%by weight
UNHG −1.20pt a year
1.97%0.77%
MVLL 4.5×the volume
3.3M726K
MVLL vs UNHG Performance
+91.2%+11.9%
- MVLL 1.97%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- MVLL $227M
- UNHG $63M
- MVLL +91.2%, better
- UNHG +11.9%
- MVLL 2
- UNHG 5
- MVLL 3.3M sh, better
- UNHG 726K sh
- MVLL $22.72
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MVLL | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A90 |
| Risk | B60 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A93Higher | A91 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MVLL and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MVLLC
UNHGA
In short
MVLL Two times Marvell's daily move, reset every night. Trading since March 2025, MVLL is the longer-running of the two 2x MRVL funds, and it charges 1.50% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
MVLL The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily percentage change of Marvell Technology, Inc.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MVLL vs UNHG Holdings
How MVLL and UNHG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of MVLL and 0.0% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in MVLLMore in UNHG | MVLL | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- MVLL100.0%
- UNHG212.0%
- MVLL1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- MVLL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in MVLL1
- In both0
- Only in UNHG1
Only in MVLL
1 security, 66.7% of MVLL by weight
- Mrvl66.67%
Only in UNHG
1 security, 12.0% of UNHG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204011.99%
Weight gaps
MVLL and UNHG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MVLL vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying MVLL vs UNHG
$17,702
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MVLL 1.97%
$32,531
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MVLL | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,336 | $1,371 | $1,965 |
| 20 | $12,012 | $5,205 | $6,807 |
| 30 | $32,531 | $14,829 | $17,702 |
- 1.97%MVLL
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
MVLL 314th cheapest of 315 funds
MVLL vs UNHG Dividends
- MVLL None
- UNHG
- MVLL
- UNHG $1.90
- MVLL
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- MVLL
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- MVLL
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
MVLL vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MVLL 186.4%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- MVLL 1.11UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- MVLL −78.9%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MVLL 7.79UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.