OKTG ranks 3rd and NBIL 97th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
NBIL vs OKTG
0.0%by weight
OKTG −0.66pt a year
1.41%0.75%
NBIL 117.0×the volume
4.5M38.5K
NBIL vs OKTG Performance
+11.8%+247.6%
- NBIL 1.41%
- OKTG 0.75%, better
- NBIL $198M
- OKTG $8M
- NBIL −60.5%
- OKTG
- NBIL 2
- OKTG 5
- NBIL 4.5M sh, better
- OKTG 38.5K sh
- NBIL $12.79
- OKTG $53.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NBIL | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C44 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | A95Higher | A73 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A76Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. NBIL and OKTG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NBILC
OKTGA
In short
NBIL Two times the daily move of Nebius, the Amsterdam AI-cloud company rebuilt from Yandex's non-Russian assets. One volatile stock, doubled, reset every night: a trading tool by design, not a set-and-forget holding.
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
NBIL The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily percentage change of Nebius Group N.V. stock.
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NBIL vs OKTG Holdings
How NBIL and OKTG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NBIL and 0.0% of OKTG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Country0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for NBIL and OKTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in NBILMore in OKTG | NBIL | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | NBIL +100.0 points | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| United States | OKTG +100.0 points | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Outside the US: NBIL 100% developed, 0% emerging.
Concentration
- NBIL100.0%
- OKTG200.3%
- NBIL1
- OKTG1
Asset class
- NBIL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- OKTG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in NBIL1
- In both0
- Only in OKTG1
Only in NBIL
1 security, 66.7% of NBIL by weight
- Nbis66.71%
Only in OKTG
1 security, 0.3% of OKTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20400.32%
Weight gaps
NBIL and OKTG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NBIL vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying NBIL vs OKTG
$10,510
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NBIL 1.41%
$24,992
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NBIL | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,444 | $1,336 | $1,108 |
| 20 | $9,017 | $5,078 | $3,939 |
| 30 | $24,992 | $14,482 | $10,510 |
- 1.41%NBIL
- 0.75%OKTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
OKTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
NBIL 257th cheapest of 315 funds
NBIL vs OKTG Dividends
- NBIL None
- OKTG None
Distribution history
NBIL vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NBIL 207.5%OKTG
- Return per unit of risk
- NBIL 0.40OKTG
- Worst fall
- NBIL −84.0%OKTG
- Market sensitivity
- NBIL 7.58OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 1.41% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.41% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.41% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.