PANG ranks 3rd and NBIL 97th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
NBIL vs PANG
PANG −0.65pt a year
1.41%0.76%
NBIL 100.9×the volume
4.5M44.6K
NBIL vs PANG Performance
−60.5%+91.6%
- NBIL 1.41%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- NBIL $198M
- PANG $9M
- NBIL −60.5%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- NBIL 2
- PANG 4
- NBIL 4.5M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- NBIL $12.79
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NBIL | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C44 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A95Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A76Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. NBIL and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NBILC
PANGA
In short
NBIL Two times the daily move of Nebius, the Amsterdam AI-cloud company rebuilt from Yandex's non-Russian assets. One volatile stock, doubled, reset every night: a trading tool by design, not a set-and-forget holding.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
NBIL The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily percentage change of Nebius Group N.V. stock.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NBIL vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NBIL vs PANG Cost
Overpaying NBIL vs PANG
$10,336
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NBIL 1.41%
$24,992
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NBIL | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,444 | $1,353 | $1,091 |
| 20 | $9,017 | $5,142 | $3,875 |
| 30 | $24,992 | $14,656 | $10,336 |
- 1.41%NBIL
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
NBIL 257th cheapest of 315 funds
NBIL vs PANG Dividends
- NBIL None
- PANG
- NBIL
- PANG $1.30
- NBIL
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- NBIL
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- NBIL
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
NBIL vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NBIL 207.5%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- NBIL 0.40PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- NBIL −84.0%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- NBIL 7.58PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.41% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.41% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.41% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.