RACK ranks 3rd and NCLD 6th of 11 funds in the AI Data Infrastructure Category.
NCLD vs RACK
1.5%by weight
RACK −0.15pt a year
0.65%0.50%
NCLD 28.7×the volume
1.09M38K
NCLD vs RACK Performance
−41.8%−16.8%
- NCLD 0.65%
- RACK 0.50%, better
- NCLD $84M
- RACK $71M
- NCLD 22
- RACK 52
- NCLD 1.09M sh, better
- RACK 38K sh
- NCLD $14.02
- RACK $43.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NCLD | RACK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F14 | C43Higher |
| Tradability | A79Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | F21 | A79Higher |
| Durability | B62 | B64Higher |
Rank among AI Data Infrastructure funds
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Same Category. NCLD and RACK are both graded against the same 11 AI Data Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
NCLD vs RACK Holdings
How NCLD and RACK differ
1.5%
Shared holdings make up 17.1% of NCLD and 1.5% of RACK.
Level by level
- Holdings1.5%
- Sector32.5%
- Country87.8%
Sector
| Sector | More in NCLDMore in RACK | NCLD | RACK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | NCLD +48.1 points | 48.1% | 0.0% |
| Technology | RACK +23.7 points | 32.5% | 56.2% |
| Industrials | RACK +20.2 points | 0.0% | 20.2% |
| Communication | NCLD +19.4 points | 19.4% | 0.0% |
| Utilities | RACK +10.8 points | 0.0% | 10.8% |
| Energy | RACK +6.7 points | 0.0% | 6.7% |
| Real Estate | RACK +3.6 points | 0.0% | 3.6% |
| Materials | RACK +2.5 points | 0.0% | 2.5% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in NCLDMore in RACK | NCLD | RACK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | NCLD +12.2 points | 12.2% | 0.0% |
| Canada | RACK +6.5 points | 0.0% | 6.5% |
| South Korea | RACK +4.0 points | 0.0% | 4.0% |
| United States | RACK +1.0 points | 87.8% | 88.8% |
| United Kingdom | RACK +0.7 points | 0.0% | 0.7% |
Concentration
- NCLD136.1%
- RACK43.9%
- NCLD18
- RACK51
Asset class
- NCLD
- Equity
- RACK
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in NCLD16
- In both2
- Only in RACK49
Only in NCLD
16 securities, 100% of NCLD by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 12/03/202653.25%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/203110.39%
- IREN Ltd7.12%
- Hut 8 Corp5.63%
- Galaxy Digital Inc4.78%
- Terawulf Inc4.31%
- Applied Digital Corp3.72%
- Riot Platforms Inc3.40%
- Core Scientific Inc3.28%
- Cipher Digital Inc2.12%
- RUM Group Inc1.47%
- Cleanspark Inc1.44%
- Keel Infrastructure Corp0.86%
- SharonAI Holdings Inc0.57%
- Boost Run Inc0.38%
- Whitefiber Inc0.30%
Only in RACK
49 securities, 98.4% of RACK by weight
- Amphenol Corp5.04%
- Nvidia Corp4.73%
- Public Service Enterprise Group Inc4.68%
- Constellation Energy Corp4.62%
- Eaton Corp Plc4.60%
- Broadcom Inc4.57%
- Micron Technology Inc4.44%
- Cameco Corp3.96%
- Sk Hynix Inc3.88%
- Quanta Services Inc3.34%
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.01%
- Oracle Corp3.00%
- Vertiv Holdings Co2.82%
- Johnson Controls International Plc2.53%
- Arista Networks Inc2.44%
- Bwx Technologies Inc2.19%
- Cummins Inc2.13%
- Sandisk Corp/De2.00%
- Seagate Technology Holdings Plc1.88%
- Dell Technologies Inc1.83%
- Bloom Energy Corp1.77%
- Ametek Inc1.76%
- Western Digital Corp1.67%
- Nexgen Energy Ltd1.55%
- Equinix Inc1.54%
- Lumentum Holdings Inc1.35%
- Everpure Inc1.30%
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co1.28%
- Synopsys Inc1.26%
- Cadence Design Systems Inc1.23%
- Qualcomm Inc1.22%
- Marvell Technology Inc1.13%
- Digital Realty Trust Inc1.13%
- Oklo Inc1.11%
- Uranium Energy Corp1.05%
- Iron Mountain Inc1.03%
- Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.99%
- Celestica Inc0.94%
- Nutanix Inc0.87%
- Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.85%
- Astera Labs Inc0.84%
- Super Micro Computer Inc0.79%
- Arm Holdings Plc0.77%
- Hubbell Inc0.72%
- Ionq Inc0.71%
- Nvent Electric Plc0.66%
- Talen Energy Corp0.44%
- Generac Holdings Inc0.41%
- Mastec Inc0.39%
Weight gaps
All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in NCLDMore in RACK | NCLD | RACK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebius Group NV | NCLD +8.92 points | 9.84% | 0.92% |
| CoreWeave Inc | NCLD +6.68 points | 7.29% | 0.61% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NCLD vs RACK Cost
Overpaying NCLD vs RACK
$2,738
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NCLD 0.65%
$12,717
RACK 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NCLD | RACK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $900 | $263 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $3,460 | $980 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $9,979 | $2,738 |
- 0.65%NCLD
- 0.50%RACK, cheaper
RACK0.50%NCLD0.65%
- Middle half of AI Data Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.65%
RACK 2nd cheapest of 11 funds
NCLD 5th cheapest of 11 funds
NCLD vs RACK Dividends
- NCLD None
- RACK None
Distribution history
NCLD vs RACK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- NCLD 0.00RACK 2.45
NCLD and RACK in the news
Category Rankings
Chips, AI and crypto took October's losses
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.