SCHO ranks 1st and NEAR 11th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
NEAR vs SCHO
SCHO −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SCHO 6.2×the volume
738K4.55M
NEAR +1.1pt
+2.9%+1.8%
NEAR vs SCHO Performance
+21.6%+10.8%
- NEAR 0.25%
- SCHO 0.03%, better
- NEAR $5.22B
- SCHO $15.7B
- NEAR +2.2%, better
- SCHO +2.1%
- NEAR 4.87%, better
- SCHO 4.18%
- NEAR 1958
- SCHO 97
- NEAR 738K sh
- SCHO 4.55M sh, better
- NEAR $50.10
- SCHO $24.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NEAR | SCHO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C50 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | B69Higher |
| Durability | A74 | A77Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. NEAR and SCHO are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NEARC
SCHOA
In short
NEAR The active outlier in a peer group of penny-cheap Treasury trackers. NEAR's managers pick across roughly 1,800 short bonds, government and corporate, aiming to out-earn the Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Government/Credit index while holding duration under three years.
SCHO Short Treasuries, stripped to the studs: roughly 100 US government bonds maturing in one to three years, wrapped in a 0.03% fee. Running since 2010, and one of the tighter builds in its corner of the bond market.
Stated mandate
NEAR The fund seeks total return above its Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Government/Credit Bond Index benchmark while generally keeping portfolio duration below three years. It is actively managed through macro allocation and security selection focused on creditworthiness and valuation.
SCHO The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the short-term U.S. Treasury bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NEAR vs SCHO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NEAR vs SCHO Cost
Overpaying NEAR vs SCHO
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NEAR 0.25%
$5,159
SCHO 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NEAR | SCHO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%NEAR
- 0.03%SCHO, cheaper
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHO cheapest of 15 funds
NEAR 12th cheapest of 15 funds
NEAR vs SCHO Dividends
- NEAR 4.87%, better
- SCHO 4.18%
- NEAR $2.43
- SCHO $1.00
- NEAR $0.19
- SCHO $0.08
- NEAR Nov 2, 2026
- SCHO Nov 2, 2026
- NEAR Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCHO Pays Nov 6, 2026
- NEAR Monthly
- SCHO Monthly
Distribution history
NEAR vs SCHO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NEAR
- SCHO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NEAR 1.8%SCHO 1.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NEAR 0.26, betterSCHO −0.17
- Worst fall
- NEAR −1.2%, betterSCHO −5.4%
- Market sensitivity
- NEAR 0.23SCHO 0.23Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
NEAR and SCHO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
