TSMG ranks 1st and NFXL 84th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
NFXL vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.29pt a year
1.05%0.76%
NFXL 21.9×the volume
1.51M69K
NFXL vs TSMG Performance
−75.7%+40.8%
- NFXL 1.05%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- NFXL $113M
- TSMG $28M
- NFXL −75.7%
- TSMG +40.8%, better
- NFXL 17.84%
- TSMG
- NFXL 10
- TSMG 5
- NFXL 1.51M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- NFXL $10.79
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NFXL | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A79 |
| Risk | C45 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A83Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. NFXL and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NFXLC
TSMGA
In short
NFXL Netflix at double speed in a single ticker. NFXL aims for 200% of NFLX's move each trading day, resets that target every day, and comes with a bear twin for traders who want the other side.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
NFXL The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Netflix common shares.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NFXL vs TSMG Holdings
How NFXL and TSMG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NFXL and 0.0% of TSMG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in NFXLMore in TSMG | NFXL | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- NFXL100.0%
- TSMG212.4%
- NFXL3
- TSMG1
Asset class
- NFXL
- Equity
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in NFXL3
- In both0
- Only in TSMG1
Only in NFXL
3 securities, 18.0% of NFXL by weight
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut8.50%
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5064.96%
- Netflix Inc4.53%
Only in TSMG
1 security, 12.4% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204012.41%
Weight gaps
NFXL and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NFXL vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying NFXL vs TSMG
$4,839
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NFXL 1.05%
$19,495
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NFXL | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $1,353 | $494 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $5,142 | $1,785 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $14,656 | $4,839 |
- 1.05%NFXL
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
NFXL 201st cheapest of 315 funds
NFXL vs TSMG Dividends
- NFXL 17.84%
- TSMG
- NFXL $1.92
- TSMG
- NFXL $0.12
- TSMG $2.73
- NFXL Sep 22, 2026
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- NFXL Sep 29, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- NFXL Quarterly
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
NFXL vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NFXL 73.8%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- NFXL −0.28TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- NFXL −84.2%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- NFXL 0.79TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.