NJAN ranks 3rd and NJUN 6th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.
NJAN vs NJUN
0.3%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
NJUN 1.2×the volume
14.4K17.3K
NJAN vs NJUN Performance
+7.4%−0.1%
- NJAN 0.79%
- NJUN 0.79%
- NJAN $331M
- NJUN $165M
- NJAN +7.4%, better
- NJUN −0.1%
- NJAN 3
- NJUN 3
- NJAN 14.4K sh
- NJUN 17.3K sh, better
- NJAN $59.99
- NJUN $32.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NJAN | NJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | D39 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C50Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A87Higher | A76 |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. NJAN and NJUN are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NJANC
NJUNC
In short
NJAN The January rung of Innovator's Nasdaq-100 ladder: hold a QQQ-linked stake, hand back the upside above a cap set each January, and get the first 15% of the year's losses absorbed. Big tech with the top and bottom sanded down.
Stated mandate
NJAN The fund seeks capped upside exposure to the Invesco QQQ Trust while protecting against the first 15% of losses during each approximately annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NJAN vs NJUN Holdings
How NJAN and NJUN differ
0.3%
Shared holdings make up 0.3% of NJUN and 0.3% of NJAN.
Level by level
- Holdings0.3%
- Sector96.4%
Sector
| Sector | More in NJANMore in NJUN | Gap | NJAN | NJUN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | NJUN +2.1 points | 58.0% | 60.1% | |
| Communication | NJUN +1.6 points | 11.1% | 12.7% | |
| Consumer Staples | NJAN +1.1 points | 6.8% | 5.7% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | NJAN +0.9 points | 11.0% | 10.1% | |
| Health Care | NJAN +1.0 points | 4.8% | 3.8% | |
| Industrials | NJAN +0.2 points | 5.3% | 5.1% | |
| Utilities | NJAN +0.2 points | 1.2% | 1.0% | |
| Materials | NJAN +0.2 points | 1.1% | 0.9% | |
| Energy | Same weight | 0.5% | 0.5% | |
| Financials | Same weight | 0.2% | 0.2% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in NJANMore in NJUN | Gap | NJAN | NJUN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 97.3% | 97.3% | |
| Canada | NJUN +0.1 points | 1.0% | 1.1% | |
| Netherlands | Same weight | 0.8% | 0.9% | |
| Brazil | Same weight | 0.4% | 0.4% | |
| China | Same weight | 0.2% | 0.2% | |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.2% | 0.2% |
Concentration
- NJAN103.1%
- NJUN103.4%
- NJAN3
- NJUN3
Asset class
- NJAN
- Stocks
- NJUN
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in NJAN2
- In both1
- Only in NJUN2
Only in NJAN
2 securities, 100% of NJAN by weight
- Qqq 12/31/2026 6.14 C102.07%
- Qqq 12/31/2026 614.31 P0.76%
Only in NJUN
2 securities, 100% of NJUN by weight
- Qqq 05/28/2027 7.38 C94.66%
- Qqq 05/28/2027 738.31 P8.44%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in NJANMore in NJUN | Gap | NJAN | NJUN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037 | NJUN +0.05 points | 0.29% | 0.34% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NJAN vs NJUN Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NJAN 0.79%
$15,174
NJUN 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NJAN | NJUN |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%NJAN
- 0.79%NJUN
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
NJAN 8th cheapest of 15 funds
NJUN 8th cheapest of 15 funds
NJAN vs NJUN Dividends
- NJAN None
- NJUN None
Distribution history
NJAN vs NJUN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NJAN 7.1%NJUN 8.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- NJAN 1.20NJUN 0.67
- Worst fall
- NJAN −20.7%NJUN −12.6%
- Market sensitivity
- NJAN 0.44NJUN 0.52
NJAN and NJUN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
