Skip to content
etf.net

NJAN vs QBQF

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

NJANCCboe

AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

QBQFBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QBQF −0.05pt a year

NJAN0.79%QBQF0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

NJAN 3.6×the volume

NJAN14.3KQBQF3.94K

NJAN vs QBQF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.1%NJAN−0.1%QBQF

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NJAN +2.1%. QBQF −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.1%3%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NJAN 0.79%
QBQF 0.74%, better
Fund size
NJAN $333M
QBQF $12M
1Y total return
NJAN +11.0%
QBQF No data
Holdings
NJAN 3
QBQF 3
Avg volume (30D)
NJAN 14.3K sh, better
QBQF 3.94K sh
NAV per share
NJAN $59.79
QBQF $25.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NJAN: Cost 39, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings not scored, Durability 87. QBQF: Cost 68, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 99, Durability 32.
Pillar letters and Scores for NJAN, QBQF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNJANQBQF
Cost30% weightD39B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC49A73Higher
Tradability15% weightA79HigherD35
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA99
Durability5% weightA87HigherD32

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NJAN and QBQF are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

QBQF ranks 1st and NJAN 2nd of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 3CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NJANCInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

QBQFBAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

In short

NJAN The January rung of Innovator's Nasdaq-100 ladder: hold a QQQ-linked stake, hand back the upside above a cap set each January, and get the first 15% of the year's losses absorbed. Big tech with the top and bottom sanded down.

QBQF No data

Stated mandate

NJAN The fund seeks capped upside exposure to the Invesco QQQ Trust while protecting against the first 15% of losses during each approximately annual outcome period.

QBQF No data

Why people hold it

  • NJAN Deep cushion by design: the first 15% of the reference asset's losses over each roughly one-year outcome period are absorbed before you feel anything.
  • The reference asset is the Invesco QQQ Trust itself, not a bespoke index. What you're buffering is the same Nasdaq-100 exposure most investors already know.
  • Part of a dated series (NAPR, NJUL run the same 15% Power Buffer on different start months), so entry dates can be laddered rather than bet on one January.
  • Fee sits right at the middle of the Nasdaq-100 buffer aisle at 0.79%, and the fund has been running its annual reset since 2020.

QBQF No data

Worth knowing

  • NJAN The cap is the price of the buffer. It's reset each January from options pricing, so a scorching Nasdaq-100 year gets left partly on the table.
  • Outcomes are engineered start-to-finish of the period. Buy or sell mid-period and your real cushion and remaining upside differ from the headline terms.
  • Cheaper ways to buffer the Nasdaq-100 exist (PBQQ runs 0.50%), and this one trades lightly, so limit orders matter more here than with the category's giants.

QBQF No data

Full NJAN profile⁠

Full QBQF profile⁠

NJAN vs QBQF Holdings

How NJAN and QBQF differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NJAN and 0.0% of QBQF.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector10 Sectors97.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in NJAN and QBQF, widest gap first
SectorMore in NJANMore in QBQF
CommunicationNJAN +1.3 points
TechnologyNJAN +1.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryQBQF +0.8 points
Consumer StaplesQBQF +0.6 points
Health CareQBQF +0.6 points
IndustrialsQBQF +0.2 points
MaterialsQBQF +0.1 points
UtilitiesQBQF +0.1 points
EnergySame weight
FinancialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in NJAN and QBQF, widest gap first
CountryMore in NJANMore in QBQF
United StatesSame weight
CanadaSame weight
NetherlandsSame weight
BrazilSame weight
ChinaSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • NJAN103.6%
  • QBQF101.6%

Securities held

  • NJAN3
  • QBQF2

Asset class

NJAN
Equity
QBQF
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in NJAN3
  • In both0
  • Only in QBQF2

Only in NJAN

3 securities, 100% of NJAN by weight

  • Qqq 12/31/2026 6.14 C102.22%
  • Qqq 12/31/2026 614.31 P1.11%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.29%

Only in QBQF

2 securities, 100% of QBQF by weight

  • Qqq 12/31/2026 5.55 C96.42%
  • Qqq 12/31/2026 739.70 P4.67%

Weight gaps

NJAN and QBQF share no securities.

All 6 NJAN holdings⁠All 5 QBQF holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NJAN vs QBQF Cost

Overpaying NJAN vs QBQF

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NJAN 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QBQF 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NJAN 0.79%
  • QBQF 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NJAN $15,174QBQF $14,307

Year by year

YearNJANQBQFOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NJAN
  • 0.74%QBQF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QBQF 7th cheapest of 15 funds

NJAN 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NJAN vs QBQF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NJAN None
QBQF None

Distribution history

NJANAll NJAN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBQFAll QBQF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NJAN vs QBQF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NJAN 7.1%QBQF No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NJAN 1.20QBQF No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NJAN −20.7%QBQF No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NJAN 0.44QBQF 0.19

NJAN and QBQF in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • NJANCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNOCTC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NJANCvsNAPRC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNAPRC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NJANCvsNJULC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNJULC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.