Skip to content
etf.net

NOCT vs QQMY

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

NOCTCCboe

Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series

QQMYCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QQMY −0.49pt a year

NOCT0.79%QQMY0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

NOCT 15.3×the volume

NOCT35.1KQQMY2.29K

NOCT vs QQMY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

0.0%NOCT+1.6%QQMY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NOCT 0.0%. QQMY +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.1%3%4%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NOCT 0.79%
QQMY 0.30%, better
Fund size
NOCT $315M
QQMY $2M
1Y total return
NOCT +8.0%
QQMY No data
Yield (12M)
NOCT 0.00%
QQMY No data
Holdings
NOCT 3
QQMY 4
Avg volume (30D)
NOCT 35.1K sh, better
QQMY 2.29K sh
NAV per share
NOCT $62.35
QQMY $25.82
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NOCT: Cost 39, Risk 48, Mission 93, Tradability 77, Holdings not scored, Durability 91. QQMY: Cost 87, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings not scored, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for NOCT, QQMY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNOCTQQMY
Cost30% weightD39A87Higher
Mission25% weightA93Not scored
Risk15% weightC48B57Higher
Tradability15% weightA77HigherF18
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA91HigherF21

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NOCT and QQMY are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

NOCT ranks 3rd and QQMY 8th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 3CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CNAPRInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  5. Rank 8CQQJLCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 8CQQMYCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  7. Rank 14DQMFEFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NOCTCInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

QQMYCCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series

In short

NOCT Nasdaq-100 exposure with a 15% airbag: over each one-year outcome period starting October 1, the fund absorbs the first 15% of the reference ETF's decline and gives up gains above a cap in return.

QQMY No data

Stated mandate

NOCT The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy based on the Nasdaq-100 exposure of QQQ. It seeks to replicate the underlying ETF’s performance over the outcome period, subject to a capped upside and a 15% downside buffer.

QQMY No data

Why people hold it

  • NOCT The deal is written into the prospectus: a 15% buffer against the reference Nasdaq-100 ETF's losses over each outcome period, paid for with a capped upside, reset every October 1.innovatoretfs.com
  • Live since October 2019, so the reset-and-cap machinery has years of real market cycles behind it rather than a backtest.
  • At 0.79%, the fee sits at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds. The defined-outcome plumbing costs no premium versus the cohort.
  • An October start date makes this the autumn rung for anyone spreading buffer exposure across reset months instead of concentrating on one date.

QQMY No data

Worth knowing

  • NOCT Thinly traded, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than with the big plain-index funds.
  • 0.79% is not the cohort floor: PBQQ runs 0.50% and the Calamos Nasdaq-100 protection funds 0.69%, on different protection terms.
  • Buffer and cap are measured across the full outcome period. Enter mid-period and your effective buffer and remaining upside differ from the stated terms.innovatoretfs.com

QQMY No data

Full NOCT profile⁠

Full QQMY profile⁠

NOCT vs QQMY Holdings

How NOCT and QQMY differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NOCT and 0.0% of QQMY.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector10 Sectors95.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in NOCT and QQMY, widest gap first
SectorMore in NOCTMore in QQMY
CommunicationNOCT +3.1 points
IndustrialsQQMY +2.7 points
TechnologyQQMY +0.9 points
Consumer DiscretionaryNOCT +0.7 points
Health CareQQMY +0.7 points
Consumer StaplesNOCT +0.3 points
UtilitiesNOCT +0.1 points
FinancialsSame weight
EnergySame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in NOCT and QQMY, widest gap first
CountryMore in NOCTMore in QQMY
United StatesSame weight
CanadaSame weight
NetherlandsSame weight
BrazilSame weight
ChinaSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • NOCT106.6%
  • QQMY104.6%

Securities held

  • NOCT3
  • QQMY3

Asset class

NOCT
Equity
QQMY
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in NOCT3
  • In both0
  • Only in QQMY3

Only in NOCT

3 securities, 100% of NOCT by weight

  • Qqq 09/30/2027 7.4 C95.69%
  • Qqq 09/30/2027 739.77 P9.95%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.99%

Only in QQMY

3 securities, 100% of QQMY by weight

  • Qqq 04/30/2027 133.55 C86.67%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.5% 04/30/202712.11%
  • Qqq 04/30/2027 667.74 P4.80%

Weight gaps

NOCT and QQMY share no securities.

All 6 NOCT holdings⁠All QQMY holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NOCT vs QQMY Cost

Overpaying NOCT vs QQMY

$9,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NOCT 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QQMY 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NOCT 0.79%
  • QQMY 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NOCT $15,174QQMY $6,149

Year by year

YearNOCTQQMYOverpaying
10$1,405$545$860
20$5,331$2,113$3,218
30$15,174$6,149$9,025

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NOCT
  • 0.30%QQMY, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QQMY cheapest of 15 funds

NOCT 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NOCT vs QQMY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
NOCT 0.00%
QQMY No data
Payout (12M)
NOCT None
QQMY None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

NOCT1 paymentAll NOCT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252019
QQMYAll QQMY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NOCT vs QQMY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NOCT 7.8%QQMY No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NOCT 1.15QQMY No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NOCT −16.2%QQMY No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NOCT 0.56QQMY 0.95

Popular comparisons

  • NOCTCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsQBQFB

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NOCTCvsNJANC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNJANC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NOCTCvsNAPRC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNAPRC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.