Skip to content
etf.net

QBQF vs QQMY

AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

QBQFBCboe

Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series

QQMYCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QQMY −0.44pt a year

QBQF0.74%QQMY0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

QBQF 1.7×the volume

QBQF3.94KQQMY2.29K

QBQF vs QQMY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.1%QBQF+1.6%QQMY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QBQF −0.1%. QQMY +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.1%3%4%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QBQF 0.74%
QQMY 0.30%, better
Fund size
QBQF $12M
QQMY $2M
Holdings
QBQF 3
QQMY 4
Avg volume (30D)
QBQF 3.94K sh, better
QQMY 2.29K sh
NAV per share
QBQF $25.88
QQMY $25.82
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QBQF: Cost 68, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 99, Durability 32. QQMY: Cost 87, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings not scored, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for QBQF, QQMY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQBQFQQMY
Cost30% weightB68A87Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA73HigherB57
Tradability15% weightD35HigherF18
Holdings10% weightA99Not scored
Durability5% weightD32HigherF21

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QBQF and QQMY are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

QBQF ranks 1st and QQMY 8th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 8CQQJLCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  4. Rank 8CQQMYCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 14DQMFEFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 36

QBQF vs QQMY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QBQF vs QQMY Cost

Overpaying QBQF vs QQMY

$8,158

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QBQF 0.74%

    $14,307

  • QQMY 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QBQF 0.74%
  • QQMY 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530QBQF $14,307QQMY $6,149

Year by year

YearQBQFQQMYOverpaying
10$1,319$545$774
20$5,015$2,113$2,902
30$14,307$6,149$8,158

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%QBQF
  • 0.30%QQMY, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QQMY cheapest of 15 funds

QBQF 7th cheapest of 15 funds

QBQF vs QQMY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
QBQF None
QQMY None

Distribution history

QBQFAll QBQF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QQMYAll QQMY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBQF vs QQMY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QBQF 0.19QQMY 0.95

Popular comparisons

  • QBQFBvsNJANC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNJANC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNOCTC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNOCTC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNAPRC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNAPRC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.