UNHG ranks 2nd and NOWL 102nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
NOWL vs UNHG
UNHG −0.64pt a year
1.41%0.77%
NOWL 16.4×the volume
11.9M726K
NOWL vs UNHG Performance
−83.2%+11.9%
- NOWL 1.41%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- NOWL $119M
- UNHG $63M
- NOWL −83.2%
- UNHG +11.9%, better
- NOWL 2
- UNHG 5
- NOWL 11.9M sh, better
- UNHG 726K sh
- NOWL $3.97
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NOWL | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A90 |
| Risk | D39 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A91 | A91 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A77Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. NOWL and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NOWLC
UNHGA
In short
NOWL A pure trading instrument: NOWL aims to deliver twice ServiceNow's daily move via total-return swaps, reset at every close. Heavily traded for a single-stock leverage fund, and it tracks that daily target closely.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
NOWL The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily percentage change of ServiceNow, Inc.'s common stock.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NOWL vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NOWL vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying NOWL vs UNHG
$10,163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NOWL 1.41%
$24,992
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NOWL | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,444 | $1,371 | $1,073 |
| 20 | $9,017 | $5,205 | $3,812 |
| 30 | $24,992 | $14,829 | $10,163 |
- 1.41%NOWL
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
NOWL 257th cheapest of 315 funds
NOWL vs UNHG Dividends
- NOWL None
- UNHG
- NOWL
- UNHG $1.90
- NOWL
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- NOWL
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- NOWL
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
NOWL vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NOWL 135.7%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- NOWL −0.52UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- NOWL −86.6%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- NOWL 1.47UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.41% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.41% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.41% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.