PANG ranks 3rd and NOWL 102nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
NOWL vs PANG
PANG −0.65pt a year
1.41%0.76%
NOWL 267.3×the volume
11.9M44.6K
NOWL vs PANG Performance
−83.2%+91.6%
- NOWL 1.41%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- NOWL $119M
- PANG $9M
- NOWL −83.2%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- NOWL 2
- PANG 4
- NOWL 11.9M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- NOWL $3.97
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NOWL | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A94 |
| Risk | D39 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A77Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. NOWL and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NOWLC
PANGA
In short
NOWL A pure trading instrument: NOWL aims to deliver twice ServiceNow's daily move via total-return swaps, reset at every close. Heavily traded for a single-stock leverage fund, and it tracks that daily target closely.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
NOWL The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily percentage change of ServiceNow, Inc.'s common stock.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NOWL vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NOWL vs PANG Cost
Overpaying NOWL vs PANG
$10,336
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NOWL 1.41%
$24,992
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NOWL | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,444 | $1,353 | $1,091 |
| 20 | $9,017 | $5,142 | $3,875 |
| 30 | $24,992 | $14,656 | $10,336 |
- 1.41%NOWL
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
NOWL 257th cheapest of 315 funds
NOWL vs PANG Dividends
- NOWL None
- PANG
- NOWL
- PANG $1.30
- NOWL
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- NOWL
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- NOWL
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
NOWL vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NOWL 135.7%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- NOWL −0.52PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- NOWL −86.6%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- NOWL 1.47PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.41% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.41% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.41% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.