Skip to content

NPFE vs QLTY

Npf Core Equity Etf

NPFEACboe

GMO US Quality ETF

QLTYANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

NPFE −0.10pt a year

NPFE0.40%QLTY0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

QLTY 39.7×the volume

NPFE10.1KQLTY402K

NPFE vs QLTY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.8%NPFE+4.4%QLTY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NPFE +1.8%. QLTY +4.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%3%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NPFE 0.40%, better
QLTY 0.50%
Fund size
NPFE $655M
QLTY $5.4B
1Y total return
NPFE No data
QLTY +17.4%
Yield (12M)
NPFE No data
QLTY 0.65%
Holdings
NPFE 162
QLTY 47
Avg volume (30D)
NPFE 10.1K sh
QLTY 402K sh, better
NAV per share
NPFE $28.20
QLTY $43.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NPFE: Cost 94, Risk 83, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 69, Durability 55. QLTY: Cost 75, Risk 68, Mission 77, Tradability 80, Holdings 75, Durability 89.
Pillar letters and Scores for NPFE, QLTY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNPFEQLTY
Cost30% weightA94HigherA75
Mission25% weightNot scoredA77
Risk15% weightA83HigherB68
Tradability15% weightB63A80Higher
Holdings10% weightB69A75Higher
Durability5% weightB55A89Higher

Rank among US Active Quality funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NPFE and QLTY are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

NPFE ranks 1st and QLTY 2nd of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

  1. Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
  2. Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 3BAQECAQE Core ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NPFEANpf Core Equity Etf

QLTYAGMO US Quality ETF

In short

NPFE No data

QLTY Most quality ETFs run a rules screen. QLTY hands the job to GMO's stock pickers, who buy US companies they judge high quality and chase plain total return. Active conviction, priced like it: 0.50% a year.

Stated mandate

NPFE No data

QLTY The Fund seeks total return. It is actively managed and invests primarily in equities of U.S. companies that GMO believes are high quality.

Why people hold it

NPFE No data

  • QLTY Actively managed, not index-tracking. GMO's team chooses the US companies it considers high quality, under a straightforward total-return mandate instead of a published factor formula.
  • GMO's read on quality leans toward wide moats and free cash flow, so the lineup can look meaningfully different from the index-built quality funds it sits beside.
  • Opened in 2023 and already a multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate daily trading and a quarterly distribution schedule.
  • The filings match the label: a standard 1940-Act fund holding US equities, screened on quality, no derivative wrapper or offshore complexity.

Worth knowing

NPFE No data

  • QLTY The 0.50% fee runs above the typical quality-cohort charge, and index-built rivals undercut it hard: QUAL at 0.15%, JQUA at 0.12%.
  • No index to fall back on. Everything rides on GMO's stock selection, and the ETF's own record only starts in 2023.
  • Mostly on that fee, it sits in the lower half of its US quality peer group even though it does the job its documents describe.

Full NPFE profile⁠

Full QLTY profile⁠

NPFE vs QLTY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NPFE vs QLTY Cost

Overpaying QLTY vs NPFE

$1,889

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NPFE 0.40%

    $8,090

  • QLTY 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NPFE 0.40%
  • QLTY 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530QLTY $9,979NPFE $8,090

Year by year

YearNPFEQLTYOverpaying
10$723$900$177
20$2,793$3,460$667
30$8,090$9,979$1,889

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%NPFE, cheaper
  • 0.50%QLTY
  • Middle half of US Active Quality funds
  • Median 0.65%

NPFE cheapest of 16 funds

QLTY 4th cheapest of 16 funds

NPFE vs QLTY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
NPFE No data
QLTY 0.65%
Payout (12M)
NPFE No data
QLTY $0.28
Last payment
NPFE $0.08
QLTY $0.06
Ex-dividend
NPFE Sep 29, 2026
QLTY Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
NPFE Sep 30, 2026
QLTY Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
NPFE Irregular
QLTY Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

NPFEIrregular · 1 paymentAll NPFE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
QLTYQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll QLTY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.04; Mar 27, 2024 $0.05; Jun 28, 2024 $0.05; Sep 30, 2024 $0.06; Dec 30, 2024 $0.09; Mar 31, 2025 $0.05; Jul 1, 2025 $0.07; Sep 30, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $0.09; Mar 31, 2026 $0.06; Jun 30, 2026 $0.08; Sep 30, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD

NPFE vs QLTY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NPFE No dataQLTY 11.9%since Dec 2023
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NPFE No dataQLTY 1.27since Dec 2023
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NPFE No dataQLTY −17.0%since Nov 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NPFE 0.48QLTY 0.98

Popular comparisons

  • NPFEAvsAQECB

    Npf Core Equity Etf · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLTYAvsAQECB

    GMO US Quality ETF · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NPFEAvsQIDXB

    Npf Core Equity Etf · Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLTYAvsQIDXB

    GMO US Quality ETF · Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NPFEAvsQFFB

    Npf Core Equity Etf · Qualivian Focus Fund ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLTYAvsQFFB

    GMO US Quality ETF · Qualivian Focus Fund ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.